Tarantino

[rich]

i kinda liked from dusk to dawn if only for the few minutes featuring
Selma Hayek before she turns into a monster and chomps on QT

rich

On 1/7/09, kelber at mindspring.com <kelber at mindspring.com> wrote:
> He's been a one-hit wonder (Pulp Fiction), but the new one looks good.
>
> LK
>
> -----Original Message-----
>>From: Charles Albert <cfalbert at gmail.com>
>>Sent: Jan 7, 2009 3:27 PM
>>To: pynchon-l at waste.org
>>Subject: Re: Tarantino
>>
>>Though QT is intolerable to watch, the balance of Sukiyaki Western Django
>> is
>>worth 90 minutes of your time....
>>
>>love,
>>cfa
>>
>>
>>
>>On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 5:02 AM, Carvill, John <john.carvill at sap.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hmmm. I reckon Tarantino jumped the shark about a third of the way
>>> through 'Jackie Brown'. R Dogs was a blast of frsh air compared to the
>>> sort of rubbish that was around at the time. Pulp Fiction, despite being
>>> about as deep as a birdbath and as realistic as Bugs Bunny, was
>>> massively enjoyable. Jackie Brown wasted De Niro and wasn't half as hip
>>> as an Elmore Leonard novel, but it was still just about worth watching
>>> twice. Kill Bill, Grindhouse, etc.? Fuggedaboutit.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>