Roky Erickson

Michael Bailey michael.lee.bailey at gmail.com
Wed Jan 28 22:15:53 CST 2009


someone much more able on the same soapbox:
http://www.ect.org/testimony-of-dr-john-friedberg-to-ny-assembly/

TESTIMONY OF JOHN M. FRIEDBERG, M.D., NEUROLOGIST, BEFORE THE MENTAL
HEALTH COMMITTEE OF THE NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MARTIN LUSTER PRESIDING

NYC, May 18, 2001

"In view of the primitive simplicity of their minds, they (the masses)
more easily fall victim to a big lie than to a little one, since they
themselves lie in little things, but would be ashamed of lies that
were too big." Adolph Hitler. Mein Kampf, Vol.1, Ch. 10, 1924 tr.
Ralph Manheim, 1943

INTRODUCTION

My name is John Friedberg. I am a board certified neurologist
practicing in Berkeley, California.

I was born in Far Rockaway (NYC) in 1942, graduated Lawrence High
School, Yale University and the University of Rochester School of
Medicine and for the past twenty years I've been seeing patients with
every conceivable neurologic problem, from headaches to Huntington's,
in my office and in hospitals.

I am in good standing with my hospitals, professional societies and
licensing boards and I'm proud to say I've never been successfully
sued.

In 1975 I published my book "Shock Treatment Is Not Good For Your
Brain" and in 1979 "Shock Treatment, Brain Damage and Memory Loss," a
peer reviewed article in the American Journal of Psychiatry.

I do not believe in mental illness. Depression is no more "the same as
diabetes" than heartbreak is the same as a heart attack.

I do not believe in hypothetical diseases of the mind but there is no
mistaking damage to the brain. Psychiatric drugs and electroshock
inflict real injury in the name of treating fictive maladies. Paul
Henri Thomas has Tardive Dyskinesia and heptatitis from psychiatric
drugs and amnesia from the ECT.

BASIS FOR OPINIONS

My opinions are based on my years of experience with patients and
review of records from all over the country as an expert witness
electroshock malpractice cases. They are based on ECT statistics from
the six states which mandate reporting; and of necessity, my opinions
are based on a lifetime following publications and statements issuing
from the small but vocal minority of psychiatrists who believe in ECT
and usually nothing but.

Fortunately for me, the believers don't always believe each other;
their data frequently belie their conclusions; and what they actually
do contradicts what they say they do. The truth slips out.

As one example: we have known since the 1950's that confining
electroshock to the non-verbal hemisphere (usually the right as in
"unilateral non-dominant ECT") causes less verbal impairment and
memory loss than bilateral ECT but the recommendation to begin with
non-dominant ECT is honored mostly in the breech.

Another example: the "grandfather" of ECT, Dr. Max Fink claims the
rate of memory loss is 1 in 200. He has repeated this so often it
sounds like a fact. But Harold Sackeim, Ph.D., just as much an
enthusiast and just as aggressive, says Fink's figure has "no
scientific basis."

Who to believe? My view is that memory loss from ECT is no "side
effect;" it's the main effect and the best studies find it in 100% of
subjects.

Incidentally, Dr. Fink didn't pick the number 1/200 out of thin air.
1/200 has consistently been the death rate from ECT administration -
as far back as 1958 and as recently as Texas and Illinois in the
1990's.

FIVE BIG LIES

Big Lie 1: Dr. Fink tells people that ECT is safer than childbirth. If
one out of every 200 women were dying in delivery it would be front
page news.

Big Lie 2: ECT doesn't cause brain damage. One picture will refute
that. The illustration below (MRI on the right, CT left, same patient)
depicts a large hemorrhage from ECT. Hemorrhages, large and small,
cause permanent seizure disorders in some patients.

(image snipped by me - MB)

( Weisberg, L. Elliott, D and Mielke, D: Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Following Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT). November 1991, Neurology V
41 p 1849.)

Another MRI study documented a breakdown of the blood brain barrier
and cerebral edema - brain swelling - after each and every shock.
(Mander et al: British Journal of Psychiatry, 1987: V 151, p 69-71)

Big lie 3: ECT is new and improved. The whole point of ECT is to
trigger a convulsion and there is simply no way around the brain's
threshold: 100 joules of energy, a typical "dose," whether brief
pulse, square wave, sine wave, AC or DC, unilateral or bilateral, with
or without oxygen equals the energy it takes to light up a 100 watt
bulb for one second or drop a 73 pound weight one foot. And it's the
energy that does the damage.

Big lie 4: ECT is a "Godsend" (Fink again). In March of this year, Dr.
Sackeim published a study in JAMA showing a "relapse rate" of 84%
within six months of stopping ECT. It is no coincidence that
improvement ceases just as the concussive effects are finally waning.
Sackeim's solution?: more ECT. Call it "maintenance" or call it
"continuation," just don't stop. (JAMA. 2001;285:1299-1307).

Big lie 5: No one knows how ECT works. On the contrary, everyone knows
how ECT works. It works by erasing memory and terrifying people.

CONCLUSION

ECT isn't back - it never went away. It's more common than appendectomy.

What has happened is that it's advocates have grown more arrogant and
the number of patients forced to undergo ECT against their will is
increasing.

This was brought to public attention by Paul Henri Thomas fighting for
his life and his mind at Pilgrim State Hospital on Long Island. Over
the past two years he has been subjected to 60 shocks and a judge just
ordered up 40 more. The newspapers state the Mr. Thomas was born in
Haiti, emigrated from oppression and was granted American citizenship.

To be held down, drugged and forcibly administered convulsive dose
after convulsive dose of electroshock to the head: can anyone think of
a greater assault on a human being's rights - short of death - in the
whole world? And it's happening here in the land of the free. That's
not acceptable.

We have had 60 years of poignant testimony from eloquent victims of
electroshock. Ernest Hemingway complained it ruined his memory and put
him out of business. He killed himself within weeks of concluding a
second course of ECT. George Orwell ends 1984 with his protagonist
being forced to love Big Brother on an electroshock table.

I urge you to declare a moratorium on electroconvulsive therapy until
it can be proven safe by evidence, not proclamation.

I urge you to declare a moratorium on electroconvulsive therapy until
patients can be guaranteed free and informed choice.

Thank you.

-- 
--
"Frenesi's eyes, even on the aging ECO stock, took over the frame, a
defiance of blue unfadable."



More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list