Every Dog Has Its Day

John Bailey sundayjb at gmail.com
Mon Oct 26 06:44:34 CDT 2009


Says as much about cultural attitudes towards dogs as it does the novel...

Although maybe, in this context, the kind of dog referred to was the
Learned English/Henry James-reading kind.

Off-topic: anyone read Johnathan Safran Foer's latest ("Eating Animals")?

Got through it in a day and have been haunted by it since, perhaps
more than anything in the past few years. Harrowing stuff; not without
major flaws (of a journalistic sort) but more obscene than GR could
ever be labelled, if only for the non-fictional aspect of the
material.

I now wish I'd never been introduced to the term "fecal mist". But I
also now realise it's the air we breathe.

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 10:23 PM, John Carvill <johncarvill at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >  it's  such a shame that the most recent two of P's novels have been such dogs.
>
> I can understand some long-term Pynchonistas not being knocked out by
> Inherent Vice, but to not like Against the Day, to consider it a
> 'dog'?




More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list