IVIV (7): He's So Heavy
Robin Landseadel
robinlandseadel at comcast.net
Mon Sep 28 12:53:57 CDT 2009
On Sep 28, 2009, at 10:41 AM, Joseph Tracy wrote:
> I never had a hallucinogenic experience that sent me into another
> world in the sense that Doc describes
I have, which in an odd way makes this scene a little harder to suss
out.
> or that people attribute to Salvia etc., but I have had lucidly
> remembered dreams that closely approximate Doc's Burgie trip or the
> trip in the story with the vision of Shasta on the Golden Fang.
There was a time when my dreams were like that as well.
> I also recall a very similar and very intense experience with a
> group of artists in the 70'S doing a collective imagination
> experiment. To me it relates more to the archetypes and collective
> unconscious of Jung than LSD per se. I think that is more how
> Pynchon is using it and LSD generally and several other
> references( Zomes, GNASH) to openings between parallel worlds.
I recall a guided meditation that led to some of these portals as well.
> In essence, the reason Doc hates the memory of this trip is that it
> forms a kind of personal mythos, an explanation for his size and
> "heaviness" which I mentioned in a previous comment:
>
> "Is the LSD memory of another world from which Doc came and from
> which he derives his compactness and a "density" that has him
> breaking through walls, a kind of reference to his ability to
> penetrate barriers to his investigations, and his focus
> on evidence and leads while smoking weed like a chimney? The whole
> story feels more Jungian than I first perceived but with a
> different set of collective memories, and while comic in tone, may
> be designed as a kind of alternative mythos of the detective story
> which will yield treasures to a probing search."
>
> It brings up the whole topic of "genius", old souls, individual
> destiny, enlightenment, scientific "breakthroughs" , that kinda
> shit. Hard to explain the density, the gravitational pull of some
> people. Artists talk about artistic expression as coming to them or
> as a kind of birth. Same thing with scientific breakthroughs coming
> in dreams or picture language. Not discounting hard work and
> learning the language of a discipline here. Doc starts with some
> seedy work to learn the chops, but seems increasingly aware of the
> karmic implications of what he does. Einstein starts with pure
> play in the realm of the physics of light, indirectly gives birth to
> nuclear age and ends up a voice for peace and non-violent
> resistance. Tesla envisions a world made better by cheap clean
> electricity , seized by westinghouse to proliferate coal burning
> power plants.
Sir William Rowan Hamilton receiving Quaternions in a vision,
ultimately leading to computer animation and untold consequences of a
more dire variety.
> Similar story with digital tech. Genius is easily coopted. Entropy.
Slothrop's temporal density drawing down V2s.
> Density is probably the central quality of Pynchons writing,
But don't forget chewiness or rich chocolaty goodness . . .
> the detritus of culture takes on the weight and shiny reflective
> brilliance of Osmium. Every word and phrase seeming to work in
> parallel universes. Doc feels alienated in world in which he is also
> deeply integrated, knows the handshake and everything, likes to hang
> out, smoke with friends, watches Basketball, longs for true love and
> good sex, but breaks through walls with the slightest pressure.
> What he finds behind the facade of individuality, chosen affinities,
> addresses and style is a war that is far from overseas. The promised
> good guys of the movies are not so easy to identify. Like Wolfmann
> and the private collection displayed on his ties (speaking of ties,
> what, in the whole panoply of vice is he not tied to), the line
> between exploiter and exploited is less than razor sharp. Typical
> for a detective noir, and a satirist.
Typical for Pynchon as well. But you already knew that.
Again, great post.
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list