IVIV20: Maybe then, 368-369

Mark Kohut markekohut at yahoo.com
Wed Feb 3 19:08:42 CST 2010


Yea, dark...sadly so....with an ironic 'joke' about the alumni associations
and their anniversaries of the 'temporary communes"....more of TRP saying
nostalgia is what you get when you haven't made a change in the society?

And, that bit that maybe the 'fog' will lift and something else this time might be there............

as narrow a possibility as TRP said the epilogue to 1984 was...but as real
as a sliver of light through the crystal palace wreckage, I guess...

--- On Wed, 2/3/10, kelber at mindspring.com <kelber at mindspring.com> wrote:

> From: kelber at mindspring.com <kelber at mindspring.com>
> Subject: Re: IVIV20: Maybe then, 368-369
> To: pynchon-l at waste.org
> Date: Wednesday, February 3, 2010, 6:10 PM
> As one of the
> some-who-did-not-like-the-book-as-much-as-many, I thought
> the fog-obscured drive was one of the better (if not the
> best) passages in the book, almost echoing the "Now
> everybody" ending of GR, in its pessimism and sense of
> camaraderie in the face of shared doom.  Does anyone
> see anything hopeful or positive in the ending?  There
> were differences of opinion on whether the endings of
> Vineland and ATD were meant to be upbeat.  I weigh in
> on the dark side, in all cases.
> 
> Laura
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: Mark Kohut <markekohut at yahoo.com>
> >Sent: Feb 3, 2010 5:45 PM
> >To: pynchon-l at waste.org,
> Paul Nightingale <isread at btinternet.com>
> >Subject: Re: IVIV20: Maybe then, 368-369
> >
> >Hey Foax,
> >
> >We've waned.....jump in on Paul's annotated ending with
> some obs, I cheerlead.  Particularly, what do we all
> think about the ending??
> >
> >I wrote, hypingly, "almost-sublime" about it, but that
> is hype....it is smoothly fine, smoothly sweet, so nicely
> meshed with story and many of P's themes, I think.
> >
> >What do some who did not like the book as much as many
> think just of the ending?
> >
> >Mark
> >
> >--- On Sat, 1/30/10, Paul Nightingale <isread at btinternet.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Paul Nightingale <isread at btinternet.com>
> >> Subject: IVIV20: Maybe then, 368-369
> >> To: pynchon-l at waste.org
> >> Date: Saturday, January 30, 2010, 11:24 AM
> >> The chapter began with Doc, inspired
> >> by sporting loss, leaving home to seek
> >> company, "tak[ing] his disappointment out on the
> road"
> >> (364). On 366 he asks
> >> Sparky if he can "look in here once in a while".
> >> 
> >> Here, returning home, he thinks of those he might
> know in
> >> the same situation
> >> (368). Up the page, anonymity, "a convoy of
> indeterminate
> >> size", and no way
> >> of knowing anyone. At the start of the twentieth
> century
> >> modernist writers
> >> like Durkheim and Tonnies described the alienation
> inherent
> >> in urban
> >> societies; in the 1960s alienation was inherent in
> the
> >> consumer society
> >> described by Marcuse in One-Dimensional Man. IV
> ends with
> >> the attempt to
> >> reconstruct some kind of community, however ironic
> his
> >> speculations (the
> >> "alumni associations" that return again and again
> to a
> >> meaningful moment).
> >> 
> >> From speculating about an indeterminate future,
> "phones as
> >> standard
> >> equipment in every car ..." etc, Doc wonders about
> what
> >> he'll do here and
> >> now "if he misse[s] the Gordita Beach exit" (368).
> Doc's
> >> reading of
> >> landscape (a nod at documentary realism: "He knew
> that at
> >> Rosecrans ..."
> >> etc) is succeeded by speculation: "Maybe then it
> would stay
> >> this way for
> >> days ..." etc (369). There are alternative endings
> on offer
> >> here, the
> >> fantasy that offers anonymity as a kind of
> liberation
> >> ("across a border
> >> where nobody could tell anymore in the fog who was
> Mexican,
> >> who was Anglo,
> >> who was anybody") set against passivity, not for
> the first
> >> time Doc
> >> "pull[ing] over on the shoulder and wait[ing]".
> The latter
> >> option has cops
> >> and "a restless blonde", the citizen still a PI.
> >> 
> >> 
> >
> >
> >      
> 
> 


      



More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list