'Nother prolly stupid, definitely belated, discussion question re IV

Mark Kohut markekohut at yahoo.com
Tue Feb 16 17:24:51 CST 2010


But, of course!, D'oh.....

Yasmeen NEEDS feminine frocks to disappear........

Females as females, are (often),,,sex (sez Sasha).....invisisble...



--- On Tue, 2/16/10, kelber at mindspring.com <kelber at mindspring.com> wrote:

> From: kelber at mindspring.com <kelber at mindspring.com>
> Subject: Re: 'Nother prolly stupid, definitely belated, discussion question re  IV
> To: pynchon-l at waste.org
> Date: Tuesday, February 16, 2010, 5:48 PM
> Think there are probably few women,
> fictional or real, who haven't felt that way at times. 
> A Pynchonian exception might be Yasmeen, who's
> uber-assertive in all situations.  She has to rely on
> quirks of time-space, or at least Snozzberry's Silent Frocks
> to disappear.
> 
> Laura
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: Mark Kohut <markekohut at yahoo.com>
> >Sent: Feb 16, 2010 5:36 PM
> >To: Ian Livingston <igrlivingston at gmail.com>
> >Cc: rich <richard.romeo at gmail.com>,
> pynchon -l <pynchon-l at waste.org>
> >Subject: Re: 'Nother prolly stupid, definitely belated,
> discussion question re  IV
> >
> >Wow, now we have a whole group theme....thanks 
> >
> >Invisible?   
> >
> >mean, partly at least, what i think it might mean?
> >
> >
> >--- On Tue, 2/16/10, Ian Livingston <igrlivingston at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Ian Livingston <igrlivingston at gmail.com>
> >> Subject: Re: 'Nother prolly stupid, definitely
> belated, discussion question re  IV
> >> To: "Mark Kohut" <markekohut at yahoo.com>
> >> Cc: "rich" <richard.romeo at gmail.com>,
> "pynchon -l" <pynchon-l at waste.org>
> >> Date: Tuesday, February 16, 2010, 4:47 PM
> >> Yeah, and how about that Lake
> >> Traverse?
> >> 
> >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Mark Kohut <markekohut at yahoo.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > yes, don't she, now that you mention it....
> >> >
> >> > --- On Tue, 2/16/10, rich <richard.romeo at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> From: rich <richard.romeo at gmail.com>
> >> >> Subject: Re: 'Nother prolly stupid,
> definitely
> >> belated, discussion question re  IV
> >> >> To: "Mark Kohut" <markekohut at yahoo.com>
> >> >> Cc: "pynchon -l" <pynchon-l at waste.org>
> >> >> Date: Tuesday, February 16, 2010, 4:00
> PM
> >> >> sounds a bit like our Katje, doesn't
> >> >> it?
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 3:50 PM,
> >> >> Mark Kohut <markekohut at yahoo.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Brought back to memory with this
> >> >> twitter question:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> littlebrown    Have you ever felt this
> way?
> >> "Seen
> >> >> from a certain angle, she might simply
> >> disappear."
> >> >> Discuss with Anita Shreve fans:
> >> >>
> >> >> http://ow.ly/17Zud
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Sasha, I believe it is, says sometimes
> when
> >> having
> >> >> sex--with Wolfmann, not Doc, if I
> remember right,
> >> she says
> >> >> she feels invisible.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Discuss? Discuss.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> "liber enim librum aperit."
> >> 
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 


      



More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list