Femenist reading of IV

[Mark Kohut]

Correct-O. Logic rules (here). I conflated TRP's critique w/ a reading (at least).

I will say that if his judgment of Marxism as a too-narrow reading of history, since part of his vision is an embodied critique of history, then it will reveal less than Marxist-readings generally think they reveal.......

Logically Yours, (I hope)



--- On Fri, 2/19/10, Ray Easton <kraimie at kraimie.net> wrote:

> From: Ray Easton <kraimie at kraimie.net>
> Subject: Re: Femenist reading of IV
> To: "pynchon -l" <pynchon-l at waste.org>
> Date: Friday, February 19, 2010, 10:20 AM
> Mark Kohut wrote:
> >  Marxist? He disses marx in Gr, I believe and
> AtD.....
> Whether or not P disses Marx is largely, if not entirely,
> irrelevant to the question of how fruitful a Marxist reading
> of his works is.
> 
> Ray
>