Queer Theory & Futurism

Mark Kohut markekohut at yahoo.com
Sat Feb 20 20:21:46 CST 2010


Thanks, but I'm having self-doubts over probable oversimplification....
He attacks futurism, we know..........but little else, therefore???

--- On Sat, 2/20/10, Phillip Grayson <phillip.grayson at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Phillip Grayson <phillip.grayson at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Queer Theory & Futurism
> To: "Mark Kohut" <markekohut at yahoo.com>
> Cc: "pynchon -l" <pynchon-l at waste.org>
> Date: Saturday, February 20, 2010, 9:15 PM
> Mmm,
> Well put. 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 8:58 PM,
> Mark Kohut <markekohut at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> 
> Damn good question I say, and damned if I, quick draw no
> matter what, have an opinion.
> 
> 
> 
> Quick second thought: prolly. After the modernists created
> into the modernity they, and TRP, hated, and said
> that....most art after that was compromised by being part of
> modernity.........???
> 
> 
> 
> Which may be why 1) the modernists (and earlier) seem to
> matter most to TRP
> 
> and 2) why some low artforms---mystery novels, cartoons,
> movies before they were 'films', etc. matter most
> later to TRP.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- On Sat, 2/20/10, Phillip Grayson <phillip.grayson at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > From: Phillip Grayson <phillip.grayson at gmail.com>
> 
> > Subject: Re: Queer Theory & Futurism
> 
> > To: "Monte Davis" <montedavis at verizon.net>
> 
> > Cc: "Mark Kohut" <markekohut at yahoo.com>,
> "pynchon -l" <pynchon-l at waste.org>
> 
> > Date: Saturday, February 20, 2010, 8:44 PM
> 
> > Obvious I guess and
> prolly well explored
> 
> > already, but with all the pastiche and such, is there
> the
> 
> > possibility that AtD mocks an artistic deterioration
> since,
> 
> > say, _Ulysses_ along with a cultural one since WWI?
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 8:40 PM,
> 
> > Monte Davis <montedavis at verizon.net>
> 
> > wrote:
> 
> >
> 
> > Mark Kohut sez:
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > > you will recall that marinetti's futurism is
> 
> > savaged big time in AtD...
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > Indeed it is, and the rush of wind that the Futurists
> 
> > loved (re-read the dive-bombing, sport with the
> flying
> 
> > girls) blows straight into hair-straight-back,
> Rockwell
> 
> > Kentish, wind-tunnel Nazi aesthetic:
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > "Roland too became conscious of the wind, as his
> 
> > mortality had never allowed him. Discovered it so . .
> . so
> 
> > joyful, that the arrow must veer into it. The wind had
> been
> 
> > blowing all year long, year after year, but Roland had
> felt
> 
> > only the secular wind . . . he means, only his
> personal
> 
> > wind. Yet . . . Selena, the wind, the wind’s
> everywhere .
> 
> > . . ."
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


      



More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list