Someone (else) speak on Inherent Vice..?

[Robert Mahnke]

Hey Jill,

Could you say more about what you mean by your first sentence?

RPM


On 1/4/10, grladams at teleport.com <grladams at teleport.com> wrote:
>
> OK, what I find so disappointing in IV is the lack of deep artful writing
> about the core topic of the book, which I presume to be a revolutionary act
> of reversing the flow of money. It's been a topic before, reversals or
> potentials of reversal-- from wistful missed opportunities of Tesla's free
> energy, reversal of time in photography, etc, and IV coulda been a
> contender.. but it aint. What I did like about IV was the story of
> Sportello's and Bjornsen's professional paths beginning at conflicting
> outlooks on the world, and then how by the end there's Sportello kind of
> being exposed, willingly? by Bjornsen, in a good wake up and smell the
> coffee kind of way, to dangers that whether we agree or not, whether we
> like it or not, bring about a concretization that the 60's or the old ways,
> are over.
>
> Jill
>
> Original Message:
> -----------------
> From: Mark Kohut markekohut at yahoo.com
> Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 14:23:13 -0800 (PST)
> To: pynchon-l at waste.org
> Subject: Someone (else) speak on Inherent Vice..?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> mail2web LIVE – Free email based on Microsoft® Exchange technology -
> http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20100105/6cd7f531/attachment.html>