is delta T entropic????
Mark Kohut
markekohut at yahoo.com
Fri Jul 23 12:44:16 CDT 2010
Is Time Disappearing from the Universe? (A Weekend Feature)
Remember a little thing called the space-time continuum? Well what if the time
part of the equation was literally running out? New evidence is suggesting that
time is slowly disappearing from our universe, and will one day vanish
completely. This radical theory may explain a cosmological mystery that has
baffled scientists for years.
Scientists previously have measured the light from distant exploding stars to
show that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate. They assumed that
these supernovae are spreading apart faster as the universe ages. Physicists
also assumed that a kind of anti-gravitational force must be driving the
galaxies apart, and started to call this unidentified force "dark energy".
The idea that time itself could cease to be in billions of years - and
everything will grind to a halt - has been proposed by Professor José Senovilla,
Marc Mars and Raül Vera of the University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, and
University of Salamanca, Spain. The corollary to this radical end to time itself
is an alternative explanation for "dark energy" - the mysterious
antigravitational force that has been suggested to explain a cosmic phenomenon
that has baffled scientists.
However, to this day no one actually knows what dark energy is, or where it
comes from. Professor Senovilla, and colleagues have proposed a mind-bending
alternative. They propose that there is no such thing as dark energy at all, and
we’re looking at things backwards. Senovilla proposes that we have been fooled
into thinking the expansion of the universe is accelerating, when in reality,
time itself is slowing down. At an everyday level, the change would not be
perceptible. However, it would be obvious from cosmic scale measurements
tracking the course of the universe over billions of years. The change would be
infinitesimally slow from a human perspective, but in terms of the vast
perspective of cosmology, the study of ancient light from suns that shone
billions of years ago, it could easily be measured
The team's proposal, published in the journal Physical Review D, dismisses dark
energy as fiction. Instead, Senovilla says, the appearance of acceleration is
caused by time itself gradually slowing down, like a clock with a run-down
battery.
“We do not say that the expansion of the universe itself is an illusion," he
explains. "What we say it may be an illusion is the acceleration of this
expansion - that is, the possibility that the expansion is, and has been,
increasing its rate."
If time gradually slows "but we naively kept using our equations to derive the
changes of the expansion with respect of 'a standard flow of time', then the
simple models that we have constructed in our paper show that an "effective
accelerated rate of the expansion" takes place."
Currently, astronomers are able to discern the expansion speed of the universe
using the so-called "red shift" technique. This technique relies on the
understanding that stars moving away appear redder in color than ones moving
towards us. Scientists look for supernovae of certain types that provide a sort
of benchmark. However, the accuracy of these measurements depends on time
remaining invariable throughout the universe. If time is slowing down, according
to this new theory, our solitary time dimension is slowly turning into a new
space dimension. Therefore the far-distant, ancient stars seen by cosmologists
would from our perspective, look as though they were accelerating.
"Our calculations show that we would think that the expansion of the universe is
accelerating," says Prof Senovilla. The theory bases it’s idea on one particular
variant of superstring theory, in which our universe is confined to the surface
of a membrane, or brane, floating in a higher-dimensional space, known as the
"bulk". In billions of years, time would cease to be time altogether.
"Then everything will be frozen, like a snapshot of one instant, forever,"
Senovilla told New Scientist magazine. "Our planet will be long gone by then."
Though radical and in many way unprecedented, these ideas are not without
support. Gary Gibbons, a cosmologist at Cambridge University, say the concept
has merit. "We believe that time emerged during the Big Bang, and if time can
emerge, it can also disappear - that's just the reverse effect."
Posted by Rebecca Sato and Casey Kazan.
Sources:
http://ukpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5jVw4s04zG-RxqVoKjwLps7coom8A
http://space.newscientist.com/article/mg19626354.000-is-time-slowing-down.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2007/12/18/scitime118.xml
----- Original Message ----
From: Ian Livingston <igrlivingston at gmail.com>
To: Mark Kohut <markekohut at yahoo.com>
Cc: pynchon -l <pynchon-l at waste.org>; Pete Cleland <pmcleland2003 at yahoo.com>;
Brad Andrews <braden.andrews at gmail.com>; mark levine <leevyne at aol.com>
Sent: Fri, July 23, 2010 1:21:37 PM
Subject: Re: is delta T entropic????
Too ironic. Got an empty page from the link.
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Mark Kohut <markekohut at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Is Time Disappearing from the Universe? (A Weekend Feature)
> Jul 10, 2010 ... The Daily Galaxy - Great Discoveries Channel -Your Daily ...
> www.dailygalaxy.com/.../2010/.../is-time-disappearing-from-the-universe-...
>
> Almost too late to post this before you know....................
>
>
>
>
--
"liber enim librum aperit."
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list