Might this discussion be gay? (NO TRP WHATSOEVER)

[Jude Bloom]

Anyone else think the whole gay/straight thing is superstition left
over from the bronze age and in 50 years we'll look back on the
division of humankind into 1)gay 2)straight as primitive, kinda like
we look back on folks who divided humakind into jew and gentile, or
man and woman for that matter.  gender and sex, i think, are about to
explode into the spectrum things we know they are.  there won't be one
or the other before too long.  there'll be a whole lotta stuff
inbetween.  you can kind of see it now with the gay community taking
transgendered folks under their wing in their fight for civil rights.
think of michael jackson.  no talent whatsoever that i could see as a
musician or entertainer -- please, i know what you're going to say,
but hopping around in shiny clothes to synthesizers just doesn't do
much for me -- but perhaps his talent will be looked back on as one of
the first transsexual transrace type folks coming up.  or not.

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Emma Wrigley <ecwrigley at excite.co.uk> wrote:
> I mean those who aren't actually gay.
>
> <-----Original Message----->
>>From: Joe Allonby [joeallonby at gmail.com]
>>Sent: 17/6/2010 4:43:52 PM
>>To: john.carvill at sap.com;john.carvill at sap.com
>>Cc: keithsz at mac.com;pynchon-l at waste.org
>>Subject: Re: Might this discussion be gay?
>>
>>Do I detect an agenda?
>>
>>
>>On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 4:42 AM, Carvill, John wrote:
>>>> Not that there's anything wrong with that.
>>>
>>> Just go along, Joe. Go along...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>.
>>