Five more Plist-related 'finds' while not looking

[Michael Bailey]

anarchy denotes no ruler,
not necessarily that there are no laws.

For one thing, there are physical laws that can't be ignored.

More germane to a poly-sci discussion, many have said that
there are, or ought to be, natural laws for human relations

I think anarchist thinkers mostly started by
responding to the fact that the existing ruling classes
were flouting natural law.

>From there, a study of history and current events
may lead to the notion that vesting a group with power
inevitably leads to abuses.

The only way to perceive that ruling classes abuse natural
law is to believe in some kind of natural law...

so, qed, and tautologically, anarchy doesn't mean no law -
quite the contrary...right?





-- 
-- "the problem with the deployment of frictionless surfaces is
that they're not getting traction."