Readux

[Henry M]

Maybe I'm too anal-a-little-kill about this, but from my experience of
our P-Liste and my knowledge of information assurance, a Pynchon Freee
for All (PFFA) may sound interesting, but the S/N would be so much
lower and the control channel would need to be so much stronger that
we'd end up resembling a Burroughsian cut-up.  I'm a big Burroughs
fan, but it sounds like a recipe for dis-asst'er.  The pie fight in
"The Great Race" is an amazing bit of choreography, but it required
amazing editing and direction skills.

AsB4,

Henry Mu
http://astore.amazon.com/tdcoccamsaxe-20

On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Mark Kohut <markekohut at yahoo.com> wrote:
> I second the whole of this pretty much as written.............
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Joseph Tracy <brook7 at sover.net>
> To: pynchon -l <pynchon-l at waste.org>
> Sent: Tue, May 11, 2010 1:46:23 AM
> Subject: Readux
>
> I kind of like the idea of the pick some Pynchon, read  and comment. But would it generate an interactive energy and what is an appropriate time frame, and can p-listers give it the energy to make it worthwhile?  Also up for V or ATD revisited. I am still listening to ATD on cd and feel it is a bit self indulgent but well worth the flaws .    I think there is still much to explore in ATD for the p-list, perhaps the greatest potential for new discovery.
>
>
>
>