ducks read? vote?

[Emma Wrigley]

Yes, though be warned I may be tempted to write shameless analyses of
chapters/books that shouldn't be named, just for the craic. Danielewski
anyone?
<-----Original Message-----> 
>From: Mark Kohut [markekohut at yahoo.com]
>Sent: 14/5/2010 6:15:27 PM
>To: brook7 at sover.net
>Cc: pynchon-l at waste.org
>Subject: Re: ducks read? vote?
>
>I second.....however the fuck THAT works.......
>
>Love it. 
>
>
>
>----- Original Message ----
>From: Joseph Tracy 
>To: pynchon -l 
>Sent: Fri, May 14, 2010 12:54:32 PM
>Subject: ducks read? vote?
>
>So here is what I'm reading as Ideas for a group read  and below I have
a 
>proposition for voting. I f you want to go with the voting proposal,
just post 
>3 choices under subject line V list:
>
>Free For All: read what you want , post and interact (FFA)
>
>TRP:
>Against the Day-
>
>V-
>
>Raymond Chandler :
>1) Farewell My Lovely
>
>2)The Big Sleep
>
>3) The Long Goodbye
>
>Ishmael Reed, Mumbo Jumbo
>
>Wurlitzer: Nog
>
>Bolano: 2666
>
>Henry Adams: The Education of Henry Adams
>
>Joyce: Ulysses
>
>Heller: Catch 22
>
>Ellison: Invisible Man
>
>I suggest we try an instant runoff  with participants voting for 3
favorites 
>in order.  If first choice less than top 2 vote-getters  then your 2nd
choice  
>counts as fist choice and so to 3rd choice,  or however the fuck that
method 
>works. and then sort it out.  I know my list is incomplete so we could
first 
>make a  complete voting list where everyone puts in 3 or less choices
for a 
>group read.  This list should all have the same subject line,  in
Pynchonian 
>spirit call it : V-list
>
>
> 
>.
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20100514/c4714517/attachment.html>