NP (It won't be P) but Cormac McCarthy

[Thomas Beshear]

For those who are interested, here's a link to Ladbrokes' odds on the Nobel. 
Ngugi seems a more likely choice than some of the others. But who knows? The 
next winner might not even be on this list; the Nobel guys are inscrutible.

http://www.ladbrokes.com/lbr_sports?action=go_generic_link&level=EVENT&key=214493738&category=SPECIALS&subtypes=&default_sort=&tab=undefined

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Morris" <fqmorris at gmail.com>
To: "Michael Bailey" <michael.lee.bailey at gmail.com>
Cc: "P-list" <pynchon-l at waste.org>
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: NP (It won't be P) but Cormac McCarthy


> He just doesn't seem the type they'd pick.
>
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Michael Bailey
> <michael.lee.bailey at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Mark Kohut <markekohut at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Nobel odds-watchers alert: Cormac McCarthy has shot up out of nowhere: 
>>> from 66/1
>>> to, suddenly, 8/1 http://bit.ly/bPb5ec
>>>
>>
>> would he accept it anyway?
>>