P, supposedly..wow! such jargon!..writer mean it or is this a parody?

[Robin Landseadel]

	. . .The main theme of Geoffrey’s[1] model of semiotic
	prepatriarchialist theory is the bridge between society and
	class. However, the premise of libertarianism holds that the
	significance of the observer is deconstruction. Sartre uses
	the term ‘the semantic paradigm of consensus’ to denote the
	paradigm, and subsequent fatal flaw, of subcapitalist sexual
	identity.

	“Sexuality is fundamentally responsible for the status quo,”
	says Marx; however, according to Hubbard[2] , it is not so
	much sexuality that is fundamentally responsible for the
	status quo, but rather the dialectic, and hence the defining
	characteristic, of sexuality. But de Selby[3]implies that we
	have to choose between libertarianism and neopatriarchial
	theory. A number of narratives concerning the postdialectic
	paradigm of reality may be discovered. In the works of
	Smith, a predominant concept is the distinction between
	closing and opening. Therefore, in Dogma, Smith reiterates
	libertarianism; in Clerks he affirms dialectic neocapitalist
	theory. Many theories concerning the role of the reader as
	writer exist.

	It could be said that Debord uses the term ‘the postdialectic
	paradigm of reality’ to denote the difference between sexual
	identity and society. If libertarianism holds, we have to
	choose between capitalist subsemioticist theory and
	capitalist construction.

	In a sense, Derrida suggests the use of dialectic
	neocapitalist theory to challenge outmoded perceptions of
	sexual identity. The characteristic theme of the works of
	Smith is not theory as such, but posttheory. . .

. . . have Professor Irwin Corey recite it, see if anybody salutes.

On Oct 24, 2010, at 7:55 AM, Mark Kohut wrote:

> submarxism, subcapitalism!, more..
>
> http://ratserel.blogspot.com/2010/10/libertarianism-and-dialectic.html
>
> Cites a book I have never seen alluded to: "Libertarianism in the  
> works of
> Thomas Pynchon"....
> Anyone know it???