[Richard Ryan]

Just about everything about Gaddis is interesting.

Here's the edition we'd read:
http://www.amazon.com/Recognitions-Penguin-Classics-William-Gaddis/dp/0140187081/ref=lh_ni_t_


On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 3:11 AM, jochen stremmel <jstremmel at gmail.com> wrote:
> Don't know if I found it here but anyway:
>
> http://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/2577/the-art-of-fiction-no-101-william-gaddis
>
> Having read that I wonder how you cannot be interested in that author.
>
> j
>
> 2011/2/5 Kai Frederik Lorentzen <lorentzen at hotmail.de>:
>>
>> Not really. Despite the fact that personally I am not interested in that
>> author, I may remind you of
>> the Nabokov read ("Pale Fire") which was done by a small sub-group here on
>> Pynchon-list some years ago. Neither did it improve our knowledge of the
>> novel itself, nor had it any positive impact on the list.
>>
>> (Of course I'm fully aware that this statement of mine did not exactly
>> reduce the probability of a Gaddis group read here.)
>>
>> Just sayin' ...
>>
>> KFL
>>
>>
>> On 05.02.2011 12:10, Richard Ryan wrote:
>>
>>> Recognitions consensus forming?
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>



-- 
Richard Ryan
New York and the World
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
The remedy for unpredictability, for the chaotic uncertainty
of the future, is contained in the faculty to make and keep promises.
    -- Hannah Arendt