time on the p-list

[Paul Mackin]

*I joined the p-list in '95

In looking back I found this email from the notorious Eric A. Weinstein  
in regard to his meeting with Gaddis.

P

Date: Tue, 1 Aug 1995 01:34:31 +0100
To: Pynchon-L@[omitted]
From: E.A.Weinstein@[omitted] (Eric Alan Weinstein, Centre For English 
Studies, University Of London)
Subject: My meeting with Mr.Gaddis
*

>
      I met Bill Gaddis about a year ago when he came to the
Univ Of London's School of Advanced Study (paid for
by the Institute of United States, a right-wing sister institute to
the Centre For English Studies---how right? It's chaired by Baroness
  Thatcher.) The title of Gaddis' lecture was "Why Its Not Possible
For Me To Give Lectures On My Work." He began his lecture
by making fun of the stupidity of the introduction to his work given
by Prof Gary McDowell (former US Solicitor General under Regan).
This went on for ten minutes and was very entertaining. He then
spoke about how The Recognitions suffered from a lack of
  recognition. In doing so he was defensive and self-effacing
in equal measures. He seemed a bit, let us say, fragile. Finally,
  he spoke about some of the other writers he felt an affinity with:
  Pynchon, Vonnegut, Delillo and Volman amongst them. In a
time hoodwinked by Reganisms, they were offering a different vision
of America, for America and the world. But he felt them to hold
a minority position vis a vis the Bellow's and the Updike's of this
world.

    Later there was a lunch, and my friend Garreth and I spoke to
both Gaddis and also a lovely old buffer who was (something like)
Henry the Eighth Prof  In Physics at Cambridge. This chap
wore the best hand-made suit I have seen in some time, complete
with colourful bow tie, real (!) collars, RMA cufflinks and braces.
  His wife was a Keats/Shelly scholar, A VERY BEAUTIFUL
woman of about 70 odd years. She, evidently, was an old friend
  of Mr. Gaddis, and called him (I think) Willy. Mr. Gaddis offered
  Garreth and myself, from a very fine gold cigarette case, two very
long, very thin cigarettes. In fact they were extraordinary. He told me
he had begun to smoke them in order to cut down on fags: thinner
  must mean less nicotine, mustn't it? (I mean, what a geezer!)

Gadddis said a few things I recollect. He said writing must be
beautiful, what ever else it is. In writing the Recognitions, he had
tried, in his way, to make a  well made object. In that, he admitted
the influence of Eliot upon him and his generation. Further he said
  that he had written the Recognitions already, and critics should
not  wonder why he had not, and could not, write the Recognitions
again. He also said that he wrote one book purely for money,
and in the end, it had been no worse in many ways than books
written for love. Iin this way there was a parallel with the relationships
  one has with other people. Some seemingly  based on mutual
   convienence at the time prove more rewarding and disinterested
than relationships entered into for love which end their days as
relationships of convienence.)

     Sadly, not many students turned up to hear him read, sadder than
the telling fact that  some of our best-known celeb lecturers failed to
appear as well. Still, Bill couldn't be too sad: after good drink
in London and more later in Cambridge at the Prof's house, he got to
fly home to a house in the Hamptons he shares (still, I think) with his
wife, Lauren Hutton.

E.A.Weinstein
Centre For English Studies
University Of London
E.A.Weinstein@[omitted]



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20110716/2e55004c/attachment.html>