Is the Paul Anderson Pynchon's Inherent Vice the Next Big Lebowski

[Thomas Beshear]

Yeah, The Big Lebowski was NOT popular at the time, was seen by many as a 
big letdown from Fargo. (Not by me -- I laughed myself silly in the theater. 
But I was also aware that most of the audience that day just DIDN'T GET IT. 
Most sat in silence.)


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mark Kohut" <markekohut at yahoo.com>
To: "Michael Bailey" <michael.lee.bailey at gmail.com>
Cc: "pynchon -l" <pynchon-l at waste.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 7:28 AM
Subject: Re: Is the Paul Anderson Pynchon's Inherent Vice the Next Big 
Lebowski


Nice excuse for some PR...but

The Big Lebowski wasn't The Big Lebowski when released. It was NOT Fargo, 
many,
many said.

And, trying to label a movie the next cult classic is like a company sending 
out
its YouTube promo to thousands and
claiming it is viral. Already.

And, The Big Lebowski had no original book to be found different/lacking 
from.
Just sayin'.

Yet, I am eager to see this myself just because...


----- Original Message ----
From: Michael Bailey <michael.lee.bailey at gmail.com>
To: P-list <pynchon-l at waste.org>
Sent: Tue, March 8, 2011 3:11:50 PM
Subject: Re: Is the Paul Anderson Pynchon's Inherent Vice the Next Big 
Lebowski

On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Henry M <scuffling at gmail.com> wrote:
>http://www.vanityfair.com/online/oscars/2011/03/is-inherent-vice-pt-anderons-big-lebowski.html
>l
>
> AsB4,
> ٩(●̮̮̃•̃)۶
> Henry Mu
> http://astore.amazon.com/tdcoccamsaxe-20
>



-- 
"The general agreement is that language should be a kind of honey.  I
like it to be a kind of speed." - Michael Moorcock