frank miller

[Joseph Tracy]

Correction.
On Nov 19, 2011, at 12:14 PM, Joseph Tracy wrote:

> Point taken.  This one is too personal and too much a reflection of the bad taste it addresses in kind.. I'll try.
I'm afraid I am unable to follow through with a less confrontational tone.  My intent is not to berate or censor a person but to honestly confront  what I regard as weak arguments and a disrespectful tone. 
>  I will, however continue to nourish my folkloristic affection for the movement which with all its weakness is the only thing I see willing to challenge the non-folkloristic and deadly grip of corporate capitalism. 
> On Nov 19, 2011, at 6:41 AM, Kai Frederik Lorentzen wrote:
Rather I would say OWS is the only thing which has broken through the media control of ideas to challenge...  Many others have been willing and more articulate but have been mostly ignored. 
> 
>> 
>> Could you please stop this ad hominem nonsense? As much as you have the right to nourish your folkloristic affection for the movement, as much others have the right to criticize it.
I respect, welcome and understand your criticism. I seem to have failed to achieve a complete neutrality of tone but am trying to proceed mindfully.  
>> 
>> On 19.11.2011 06:58, Joseph Tracy wrote:
>>> ... Martin Luther King was just looking to get media attention. Could it be Michael F who feels insecure and tries to get attention by attacking Berkeley philosophy professors and a movement that has succeeded in initiating a much needed nationwide conversation about the tension between democracy and Friedman style capitalism? If you have tactical ideas which are better than those you see being used, then maybe you should get involved and offer your ideas. Instead of mocking David, how about Michael F  squaring off against Goliath? By the way, precise argument and overall scholastic credibility might be helped by mastering the difference between the possessive pronoun and the adverb spelling of their/there.