on money (in the abstract)

[David Morris]

Right.  Good for the NYT!  WaPo is following the easiest path of "both
sides are the problem" excuse for journalism these days.
Fact-checking and historical perspective are almost non-existent in
any journalism today, except for blogs, MSNBC, and foreign TV/Press.

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Paul Mackin <mackin.paul at verizon.net> wrote:
>
> The republican provisional offer of a so-called compromise on revenues was a hoax--a scheme to get the Bush tax cuts extended.
>
> The Washington Post editorial this morning completely fudged this fact. It didn't lie but it didn't connect the dots either.
>
> The Times did good however.
>
> P
>