NP - OWS is Winning
Ian Livingston
igrlivingston at gmail.com
Tue Nov 29 15:29:59 CST 2011
Peace, then. I agree to disagree moderately and politely.
The times are indeed scary, and exciting. The way the world does
business must change, and soon--but how far the pendulum swings will
determine how we survive, or how far we fall, in the course of the
changes that come.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Henry M <scuffling at gmail.com> wrote:
> And I'm genuinely sorry that I reacted so badly, but it's not easy being a
> lefty who supports centrist pragmatism in what I believe are genuinely scary
> times.
>
>
> AsB4,
> ٩(●̮̮̃•̃)۶
> Henry Mu
> http://astore.amazon.com/tdcoccamsaxe-20
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Ian Livingston <igrlivingston at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, Henry, I woke up cranky and reacted like a cranky kid.
>>
>> Even so, I do support the movement.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Henry M <scuffling at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Ian, I have never seen you write like such an adolescent. The juvenile,
>> > unreasoned, but passionate taunts of OWS become you! I have no wax over
>> > my
>> > ears and, unlike many, I will not extol the emporers new clothes, as I
>> > do
>> > not have the party-line wool pulled over my eyes, and I have not drunk,
>> > and
>> > I will not drink, the any demonstration and any change is good kool-aid.
>> >
>> >
>> > AsB4,
>> > ٩(●̮̮̃•̃)۶
>> > Henry Mu
>> > http://astore.amazon.com/tdcoccamsaxe-20
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Ian Livingston
>> > <igrlivingston at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Well, Henry, you can continue with the wax over your ears, and your
>> >> rose-colored glasses. Me, I'm on board for the duration. OWS has
>> >> started something bigger than happened in the 60s and 70s. You can let
>> >> that pass because the new set of protesters doesn't do it the way you
>> >> want it done, or you can pick up the lesson book and take it to
>> >> school.
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Henry M <scuffling at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > That OWS is a mob (a large or disorderly crowd of people) did not
>> >> > detract
>> >> > from the message going into month two of the occupancies. That it
>> >> > never
>> >> > became more than a mob, and has not since developed new ends or means
>> >> > (with
>> >> > the exception mic-checking) has.
>> >> >
>> >> > There is no comparison with the sixties. There is no draft. There
>> >> > is
>> >> > no
>> >> > carpet-bombing. And in the sixties, we expected to be arrested when
>> >> > we
>> >> > broke the law. I'm down with the goals that came out of OWS; out of
>> >> > the
>> >> > mouths of babes, and all that, but OWS has been seen, and there is
>> >> > now
>> >> > very
>> >> > little worth hearing.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > AsB4,
>> >> > ٩(●̮̮̃•̃)۶
>> >> > Henry Mu
>> >> > http://astore.amazon.com/tdcoccamsaxe-20
>
>
--
"Less than any man have I excuse for prejudice; and I feel for all
creeds the warm sympathy of one who has come to learn that even the
trust in reason is a precarious faith, and that we are all fragments
of darkness groping for the sun. I know no more about the ultimates
than the simplest urchin in the streets." -- Will Durant
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list