Bodysurfing

Kai Frederik Lorentzen lorentzen at hotmail.de
Sun Dec 30 05:54:39 CST 2012


It's telling that the wife's name Ilsebill is a regional variation of 
Isebel which is the German name - see  Luther bible and Zürich bible as 
well - of Jezebel from the Old Testament (1 Kings, 16.31 till 2 Kings, 
9.37), Ahab's wife. She also gets mentioned in the Revelation (2.20) of 
the New Testament. For more information see here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jezebel

On 30.12.2012 06:37, Ian Livingston wrote:
> Okay, yes, it is an interesting little story isn't it? I think Jung 
> would surely have been inclined to do something with it, or von Franz, 
> maybe. Here's the story: http://www.pitt.edu/~dash/grimm019.html 
> <http://www.pitt.edu/%7Edash/grimm019.html>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Bekah <bekah0176 at sbcglobal.net 
> <mailto:bekah0176 at sbcglobal.net>> wrote:
>
>     "The Fisherman and His Wife"   is an old  German folks story
>     collected by the Brothers Grimm.   Jung may have done something
>     with it.
>
>     Bekah
>
>     On Dec 29, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Ian Livingston
>     <igrlivingston at gmail.com <mailto:igrlivingston at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     > I have heard that story of the fisherman and his wife before,
>     but I'm not sure where. I am pretty sure it wasn't in Jung, but he
>     might readily comment on it. I'll take a brief stab at the major
>     symbols of the sea and the fish. The man and the woman might get
>     too involved for me at the moment. As David  posted earlier in
>     this thread, the sea often represents the personal unconscious,
>     but it more often is representative of the collective unconscious,
>     which constitutes all the factors that influence us
>     psychologically of which we are unaware. Fish are visitors from
>     the unconscious that can make us momentarily dimly aware that
>     there's a lot going on that we don't know, or maybe that we are
>     part of something greater than we know. That the woman wants more
>     the more she learns, or acquires, is interesting. Virgin / whore /
>     mother, whatever, greed is not typically one of the
>     characteristics credited to women in the big stories of the West,
>     except in the case of the gods. But if the fish is symbolic as a
>     messenger from the unconscious delivering increasingly subtle
>     understandings of things, that might make sense. It might relate,
>     in a way, to the Zen ox herding pictures, which depict the
>     meditator in increasingly subtle stages of acquiring the mental
>     attributes of enlightenment. In the penultimate picture, the
>     meditator is either nonexistent or pictured as an ouroboros,
>     signifying his having developed beyond ego, and in the last
>     picture he is portrayed as a beggar entering the marketplace with
>     his hands open and extended to offer what he has acquired. The
>     piss pot, by such a reading, might be the ground and goal (to use
>     Meister Ekhart's terms) of the pursuit of God.
>     >
>     > As to understanding alchemy, well, people have been trying that
>     for thousands of years. One thing that seems to make Taoist and
>     Buddhist alchemy somewhat easier for me to grasp is that it uses
>     fewer symbols and talks about various 'energies' (for lack of a
>     better word at the moment). Western alchemy, though, is deeply
>     moving in its imagery. Jung is probably the best authority on
>     Western alchemy, so if you really want to learn more the easy way,
>     Psychology and Alchemy, Alchemical Studies, Aion, and Mysterium
>     Conionctionis are superb inquiries into understanding alchemy from
>     a quasi-scientific psychological perspective.
>     >
>     > On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Joseph Tracy <brook7 at sover.net
>     <mailto:brook7 at sover.net>> wrote:
>     > This is real interesting. I wish I understood more clearly the
>     role of alchemy in exemplifying this Mother Son transformation. My
>     natural association for this archetype is more Catholic( albeit
>     that is certainly laden with an earthy peasant spirituality) than
>     alchemy. But I feel my understanding of the purpose and historical
>     practice of alchemy is vague at best. It seems to mean very
>     different things to different people and that throws me off.
>     >
>     > There is a  story of the Fishermans wife where a couple starts
>     off living in a pisspot  by the ocean, He catches a magic fish who
>     speaks and asks to be released. He does so. But the dissatisfied
>      wife sends him to ask the fish to grant wishes and moves with
>     each wish toward greater comfort and power from cottage to castle,
>     emperor to pope   as the sea gets more and more stormy and finally
>     foul  dark and boiling. She goes too far, asking to be God and
>     they are back in the pisspot.   I take it as both the course of
>     ambition and as a dissident folk version of the history of
>     Christianity.  The correspondence between the state of the ocean
>     and the state of the soul has an intuitive and powerful
>     psychological heft, a mythic cinematic grandness that is not the
>     normal folk tale.
>     > On Dec 29, 2012, at 1:37 PM, Ian Livingston wrote:
>     >
>     > > > The sea in Pynchon seems an aspect of the concept of
>     underground. In ATD there is a cavern which holds  a >secret sea
>     under a desert. In IV the sea holds the menace of inherent vice
>     and the possibility of Lemurian >redemption.
>     > >
>     > > This struck a chord, so I went grubbing and came up with pages
>     23-4 in Psychology and Alchemy:
>     > >
>     > > "The point is that alchemy is rather like an undercurrent to
>     the Christianity that ruled on the surface. It is to this surface
>     as the dream is to the consciousness, and just as the dream
>     compensates the conflicts of the conscious mind so alchemy
>     endeavours to fill in the gaps left open by the Christian tension
>     of opposites....The historical shift in the world's consciousness
>     towards the masculine is compensated at first by the chthonic
>     femininity of the unconscious. In certain pre-Christian religions
>     the differentiation of the masculine principle had taken the form
>     of the father-son specification, a change which was to be of the
>     utmost importance for Chritianity. Were the unconscious merely
>     complementary, this shift of consciousness would have been
>     accompanied by the production of a mother and daughter, for which
>     the necessary material lay ready to hand in the myth of Demeter
>     and Persephone. But, as alchemy shows, the unconscious chose
>     rather the Cybele-Attis type in the form of the prima materia and
>     the filius macrocosmi, thus proving that it is not complementary
>     but compensatory.This goes to show that the unconscious does
>     simply act contrary to the conscious mind but modifies it more in
>     the manner of an opponent or partner. The son type does not call
>     up a daughter as a complementary image from the depths of the
>     'chthonic' unconscious--it calls up another son. This remarkable
>     fact would seem to be connected with the incarnation in our
>     earthly nature of a purely spiritual God, brought about by the
>     Holy Ghost impregnating the womb of the Blessed Virgin. Thus the
>     higher, the spiritual, the masculine inclines to the lower, the
>     earthly, the feminine; and accordingly, the mother, who was
>     anterior to the world of the father, accommodates herself to the
>     masculine principle and, with the aid of the human spirit...,
>     produces a son--not the antithesis of Christ but rather his
>     chthonic counterpart, not a divine man but a fabulous being
>     conforming to the nature of primordial mother. And just as the
>     redemption of man the microcosm is the task of the 'upper' son, so
>     the 'lower' son has the function of a salvator macrocosmi.
>     > >     "This, in brief, is the drama that played out in the
>     obscurities of alchemy."
>     > >
>     > >
>     > > On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Mark Kohut
>     <markekohut at yahoo.com <mailto:markekohut at yahoo.com>> wrote:
>     > > nice..very.
>     > >
>     > > From: Joseph Tracy <brook7 at sover.net <mailto:brook7 at sover.net>>
>     > > To: P-list List <pynchon-l at waste.org <mailto:pynchon-l at waste.org>>
>     > > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2012 8:49 PM
>     > > Subject: Re: Bodysurfing
>     > >
>     > > My sense of the Biblical meaning is  that the sea functions as
>     a metaphor for the whole of humanity and also for death and
>     transience( as in Jonah or the parting of the red sea, Moses out
>     of waters).  There is a psalm that says the voice of the Lord is
>     upon the waters.  Jesus uses the surface of Gallilee to amplify
>     his voice. Also I think in Rev. his voice is as the voice of many
>     waters. In Jung the waters are the subconscious.  In IV there is
>     that scene in the seafood restaurant where we are asked to
>     consider what we are dumping into one of the world's primary food
>     sources and how long we can poison the waters we swim in). And
>     Jesus was a sailor when... ............
>     > >
>     > > Okay so  this is a pretty big metaphor-  transformation,
>     language, flow of life, death and resurrection, primordial soup,
>     beginning and end of all flow( all the rivers run into the sea ,
>     but the sea is not full .Eccl.) arena of naval power and
>     colonialism,  3/4ths of the body of living things,  subconscious/
>     sleep/dream  . This is such a big metaphor it is more like the
>     reason that all language is metaphoric, slivers of fast fish (As
>     Alice would say) in a big blue dream, not so much a symbol as a
>     source of the symbolic.
>     > >
>     > > The sea in Pynchon seems an aspect of the concept of
>     underground. In ATD there is a cavern which holds  a secret sea
>     under a desert. In IV the sea holds the menace of inherent vice
>     and the possibility of Lemurian redemption.
>     > >
>     > > I like the comparison to time. In that sense we all walk on
>     the sea for a moment and carry all time with us. Everything we
>     know is as eternal and ephemeral , as solid and un-supporting as
>     the waters we walk on.  No miracle in board or body though; just
>     harmonious physics, skill, saltwater and waves.
>     > >
>     > >
>     > > On Dec 28, 2012, at 11:40 AM, Ian Livingston wrote:
>     > >
>     > > > Hm. Odd I never made that association before. My Pa was a
>     minister and I, in my anti-faith, researched the literature well
>     and I don't recollect coming across the sea as the body of the
>     church. I was taught that Christ was the body of the Church and
>     that he was a fisher of men, i.e., one who pulled men out of the
>     sea and to himself.
>     > > One must never be so inconsiderate at that point to ask if
>     Jesus then proceeds to sell the fish in the market, grill and eat
>     them, smoke them or hang them up to dry. A fisherman , after all,
>     is not the fishes best friend or savior.  It could be better
>     argued that the fish saves the fisherman than that the fisherman
>     saves the fish.
>     > >
>     > > > Jung, of course, a theologically literate type, associates
>     water in general with the chthonic, pre-conscious darkness. From
>     that perspective, walking, gliding, or sailing over it, while a
>     dicey bit of work, is precisely the business of the conscious
>     (awakened, enlightened) people of the world.
>     > > >
>     > > > Surf's up!
>     > > >
>     > > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 4:46 AM, <bandwraith at aol.com
>     <mailto:bandwraith at aol.com>> wrote:
>     > > > Yea! Well, there are many different priesthoods in our
>     complex modern society, whose collective motto might be:
>     "Obfuscating you is just the nature of our game."
>     > > > Science and literature as much as religion, in that regard.
>     But the sea is still the sea, and we shall see whose left
>     standing, or swimming as the case may be, come Lemuria- a garden
>     for octupi.  Occupying octupi, one would hope...
>     > > >
>     > > > Happy New Year!
>     > > >
>     > > >
>     > > >
>     > > > -----Original Message-----
>     > > > From: lee momonin <momonin at gmail.com <mailto:momonin at gmail.com>>
>     > > > To: bandwraith <bandwraith at aol.com <mailto:bandwraith at aol.com>>
>     > > > Cc: pynchon-l <pynchon-l at waste.org <mailto:pynchon-l at waste.org>>
>     > > > Sent: Fri, Dec 28, 2012 7:07 am
>     > > > Subject: Re: Bodysurfing
>     > > >
>     > > >
>     > > > therefore happy new year!
>     > > >
>     > > > Following the mood of bodysurfing
>     > > > http://www.zuguide.com/#Being-There
>     > > > the garden will make you happy too
>     > > >
>     > > >
>     > >
>     > >
>     > >
>     > >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > --
>     > "We know that the mask of the unconscious is not rigid--it
>     reflects the face we turn towards it. Hostility lends it a
>     threatening aspect, friendliness softens its features."
>     > --C.G. Jung
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> "We know that the mask of the unconscious is not rigid--it reflects 
> the face we turn towards it. Hostility lends it a threatening aspect, 
> friendliness softens its features."
> --C.G. Jung

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20121230/eb536887/attachment.html>


More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list