No comment except Cowart is good (in earlier book)

[Mark Kohut]

Reviewer is doing a thesis on TRP so has read all the criticism. Most readers of 
Pynchon have not.
 
Where are Cowart's oft ne'er-so-well-expressed insights manifested in the 
general reading culture of Pynchon's work? 
 
That is what I want from the plist....insights for we Non-or-Amatuer Self-Read scholars.
 
Insights for life.....that new readers can sorta INHABIT.....


----- Original Message -----
From: alice wellintown <alicewellintown at gmail.com>
To: Mark Kohut <markekohut at yahoo.com>
Cc: 
Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2012 8:32 AM
Subject: Re: No comment except Cowart is good (in earlier book)

I will read it. but most of what cowart, if the review is accurate,
says,  has been said. i guess that the p-industry, and inherebt vice
and agains the day are the start of it from the pynchons, author and
agent, has to now move to shore up the claims to p greatness, worthy
of a nobel--historical authors all, and keep the cult followers happy
as they move to market to the beach novel buyers.

On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Mark Kohut <markekohut at yahoo.com> wrote:
> http://www.berfrois.com/2012/07/pynchon-and-the-past-joanna-freer/