GR translation: across a clear skirmish-line from the Force

[Mark Kohut]

I think this insight may go deeper to resolve some nagging ambiguity I still had. (With a footnote-like difference) Namely,
is Force of Gravity virtually the same as the Force?
Gravity is natural, like Time and within TRPs works such are usually felt to be the way things should be lived, so to speak. 
Without the distortions of consciousness, per Morris' emphasis, we might accept that Death is a natural thing and a 
necessary part of fecundity.
But, we mostly don't. We live with That repressed and the fear helps lead to ....?? rockets, wars, etc?
So, the Force of Gravity is now not so good although it should be (and also IS from some ideal in TRPs vision)
 
Look at the book's title in that regard. I am now mentally comparing Gravity to the Against in Against the Day, "against"
being a word that also means For....(as in storing up against the day....). Maybe Gravity does as well, as Rainbow is ironic
and also a good beautiful natural phenomenon. 
 
I remember how much Brown's Life Against Death is in GR, a book which argues if we could live
right, unrepressed, fufilling our natural psychobiological selves we would not fear Death and Gravity
would not be heavy, so to speak.
 

From: David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com>
To: Monte Davis <montedavis at verizon.net> 
Cc: Mike Jing <gravitys.rainbow.cn at gmail.com>; Pynchon Mailing List <pynchon-l at waste.org> 
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: GR translation: across a clear skirmish-line from the Force

A part of GR's "mission" (IMO) is an exploration into the many faces
of the pathological state of human consciousness (with a large dose of
Freudian Repression).  In that light, Nora as "literally the Force of
Gravity" is also the embodiment of the Earth, and Death (as in the
place where all life eventually goes), and maybe also the death-wish
(to go back to sleep).  It is fitting that such an entity would be
female, because Death is a natural thing, and a necessary part of
fecundity.  So I would propose that the Force of Gravity is not "bad."

David Morris

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Monte Davis <montedavis at verizon.net> wrote:
> The "yes"es seem to me a repeated affirmation: she's ready IN SPITE of
> imminent disaster, IN SPITE OF anyone who may be watching. Also, for readers
> of Big Encyclopedic Novels in English, surely a nod to Molly Bloom's "yes I
> will yes" sexual soliloquy at the end of Ulysses.
>
> The Force? Opposed to the (much more frequently named) Counterforce of
> slackers, dopers, and  mindless pleasure-seekers,  the Force is the book's
> big bad They: everything that rules, controls, dehumanizes. The best clue is
> the only capitalized reference to it I know, on p. 639 (Penguin pb), where
> Dodson-Truck is thinking of Nora:
>
> "In recent weeks, in true messianic style, it has come clear to her that her
> real identity is, literally, the Force of Gravity. [italics] I am Gravity, I
> am That against which the Rocket must struggle, to which the pre-historic
> wastes submit and are transmuted to the very substance of History . . . ."
>
> But wait: isn't the Rocket itself emblematic of inhuman lunar-Nazi dreams of
> transcendence (not to mention death and destruction here and now)? If the
> Force is bad, a-and the Rocket struggling against it is also bad...???
>
> Good question. "[Oedipa] had heard all about excluded middles; they were bad
> shit, to be avoided; and how had it happened here, with chances once so good
> for diversity?"
>
> Or: http://writeonill.org/masondixon.htm
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-pynchon-l at waste.org [mailto:owner-pynchon-l at waste.org] On Behalf
> Of Mike Jing
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 8:48 AM
> To: Pynchon Mailing List
> Subject: GR translation: across a clear skirmish-line from the Force
>
> P222.2-13  ...her skirt is pulled up in back, the bare bottoms of her
> thighs, marked red from the train seat, turn toward him . . . yes . .
> . in the imminence of disaster, yes, whoever's watching yes. . . .
> "Leni, where are you?" She was at his elbow not ten seconds ago.
> They'd agreed beforehand to try and keep together. But there are two sorts
> of movement out here-as often as the chance displacements of strangers,
> across a clear skirmish-line from the Force, will bring together people
> who'll remain that way for a time, in love that can even make the oppression
> seem a failure, so too love, here in the street, can be taken centrifugally
> apart again: faces seen for the last time here, words spoken idly, over your
> shoulder, taking for granted she's there, already last words-
>
> First, how should I interpret the three "yes" in " yes . . . in the
> imminence of disaster, yes, whoever's watching yes. . . ."?
>
> Second, what is "the Force" in "across a clear skirmish-line from the
> Force"?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20120712/f2383c3c/attachment.html>