An Interview with Terry Eagleton

[Madeleine Maudlin]

But is literature Rational, is the question.

To hear Marx talk about it, dialectic could be applied to particulars, but
in this particular case it didn't pan out for him. The only revolution
occurred in Russia, which he said was not particularly ready for it.

Can you imagine that?  God what an asshole!

"Hey Karl, we're ready and rarin' to go, over here, in Russia."
"You're not ready for shit!  You're out.  Pipe down."


On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Paul Mackin <mackin.paul at verizon.net>wrote:

>  On 6/7/2012 9:40 AM, Mark Kohut wrote:
>
>  Even Marx can be 'right' with certain small-t truths. And he was.
>
> Like anyone or stopped clocks too.
>
>
> I first heard that head-standing bit in high school sociology class.  The
> teacher being a Thomist considered Marx's over emphasis on the material as
> plain wrong. Terry Eagleton plays Thomist a little in his new book--for the
> sake of explication--his Catholic upbringing he sez.  Thomas was convinced
> that ideas are Real and Eagleton wants to show that Literature is kind of
> Real too. He's mad at the postmodernists. I'm assuming--haven't got far in
> the book and may never.
>
> By the way, can't the dialectic method be applied to both universals and
> particulars?
>
>
> P
>
>
>   *From:* Madeleine Maudlin <madeleinemaudlin at gmail.com><madeleinemaudlin at gmail.com>
> *To:* Michael Fonash <mff8785 at gmail.com> <mff8785 at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* Dave Monroe <against.the.dave at gmail.com><against.the.dave at gmail.com>;
> alice wellintown <alicewellintown at gmail.com> <alicewellintown at gmail.com>;
> pynchon -l <pynchon-l at waste.org> <pynchon-l at waste.org>
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 7, 2012 12:20 PM
> *Subject:* Re: An Interview with Terry Eagleton
>
> Marx even called himself a left Hegelian.  He wasn't even shy about the
> wholesale theft.  I've always wondered about how you could take somebody
> else's idea apply it elsewhere, turn it on its head whatever, and possibly
> expect it to be true, or to suggest it might be true.
>
>  "Well look mate, that's Hegel."
> "Yes but now it's right."
>
>  Is Nietzsche right wing?  He's anti-nationalist.  Anti-democracy.
>  Neither of those two things place a person on the right.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Michael Fonash <mff8785 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I am still dumbfounded as to how the many vociferous, outspoken
> Profs/Phd's(certainly not all) can not see how Marx is a radical
> left-wing theorist as Nietzsche is a radical right-wing theorist:
> neither being anywhere near "truth" or an effective, sustainable
> theory of Modern gov't.  Accurately, they are brilliant re-writers of
> Hegel and not much else.  The title "Marx is Right" is just...
> foolish and silly.
>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Dave Monroe <against.the.dave at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:06 PM, alice wellintown
> > <alicewellintown at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> http://www.oxonianreview.org/wp/an-interview-with-terry-eagleton/
> >
> > http://yalepress.yale.edu/book.asp?isbn=9780300169430
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20120607/30491768/attachment.html>