threatdown

David Morris fqmorris at gmail.com
Thu Jun 14 14:37:27 CDT 2012


You two sure do sound like a pair of sock-puppets, one in each hand of
the same person.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_(Internet)

A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception. The
term—a reference to the manipulation of a simple hand puppet made from
a sock—originally referred to a false identity assumed by a member of
an internet community who spoke to, or about himself while pretending
to be another person.[1] The term now includes other uses of
misleading online identities, such as those created to praise, defend
or support a third party or organization.[2] A significant difference
between the use of a pseudonym[3] and the creation of a sockpuppet is
that the sockpuppet poses as an independent third-party unaffiliated
with the puppeteer.

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Iris Sirius <irissiriustce at gmail.com> wrote:
> Nobody's interested in playing your paranoid fantasy games, Mad.  They're
> too paranoid.  93% of the eight people on here know that nine eleven was an
> inside job, but the thing is, 911 worked, it made everybody afraid to be
> associated with evildoers, so you can't talk about evildoing even in a
> negative context, because we literary people no all about the evil problems
> contexts can cause.
>
> What more obvious place to seek evildoers than a Pynchon Club?  Of course
> we're being watched, observed, right?  We can't discuss where the Next Big
> Threat will be etc., because that will autiomatically raise suspicions.  Why
> are we discussing evildoing?  Hmm?  Even though everybody with half a brain
> knows that certain societies need periodic Big Threats to sustain
> themselves.  And when was the last one in the Land of the FreedomLovers?
>
> A good Chomsky exercise in totalitarian-shutdown would be to start an
> organization that studied where when and how would be the next big one, and
> then start investigating the who.  Accordingly to Noam, we'd all be fine
> until somebody started paying attention to us.  And the thing is, all eight
> people on this list believes there's a lot more than eight people on this
> list watching, listening, sniffing around, paying attention to the drunken
> rants of longing souls.
>
> I was going to end with Zarathustra, but I see all that is available is the
> Common translation, nevermind.  On Redemption, was it, something about a
> giant ear, Zarathustra wishing into it like some poor pining Mason for his
> Love?
>
> What is that about conscience, cruelty turned inward...?  Have our rulers no
> conscience?  No wait, no that's, that's way too ironic...
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Madeleine Maudlin
> <madeleinemaudlin at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone have an idea when where and how the Next Big Threat to
>> freedomlovers is. going. to. be. and who will freedomlovers attack and
>> invade.in.response.to.?
>>
>> For example, London, 2012, summer olympics, computer virus, Tibet.
>>
>> Aren't there websites where you can make those bets, what are some?
>>
>>
>



More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list