threatdown

[Keith Davis]

Pathologickly?...that's an Alicism..
On Jun 14, 2012 4:03 PM, "David Morris" <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:

> Funny.  I almost missed that.  Terrance?  It seems your slip is showing...
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:57 PM,  <kelber at mindspring.com> wrote:
> > If Madeleine says that (s)he is not Madeleine, then (s)he must be Iris.
>  Or
> > Alice.  Or Terrence.  Or all of them.
> >
> > Laura
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Madeleine Maudlin
> > Sent: Jun 14, 2012 3:53 PM
> > To: David Morris
> > Cc: Iris Sirius , P-list
> > Subject: Re: threatdown
> >
> > It would be pathologickly insane to attempt to deceive literature
> experts by
> > acting like two different characters.  Enki himself could not do so, even
> > acting like Enlil.
> >
> > This is my only proof that obviously I am not Madeleine: I am not
> > pathologickly insane.  Although her name does look fake.
> >
> > But you have reminded me of something that would be appropriate if your
> icky
> > sockpuppet insinuation were true:
> >
> > "Your Honor, you are too clever for us naughty people."
> >
> > If me and Madeleine sound alike to you, well, sexist.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:37 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> You two sure do sound like a pair of sock-puppets, one in each hand of
> >> the same person.
> >>
> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_(Internet)
> >>
> >> A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception. The
> >> term—a reference to the manipulation of a simple hand puppet made from
> >> a sock—originally referred to a false identity assumed by a member of
> >> an internet community who spoke to, or about himself while pretending
> >> to be another person.[1] The term now includes other uses of
> >> misleading online identities, such as those created to praise, defend
> >> or support a third party or organization.[2] A significant difference
> >> between the use of a pseudonym[3] and the creation of a sockpuppet is
> >> that the sockpuppet poses as an independent third-party unaffiliated
> >> with the puppeteer.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Iris Sirius <irissiriustce at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Nobody's interested in playing your paranoid fantasy games, Mad.
> >> >  They're
> >> > too paranoid.  93% of the eight people on here know that nine eleven
> was
> >> > an
> >> > inside job, but the thing is, 911 worked, it made everybody afraid to
> be
> >> > associated with evildoers, so you can't talk about evildoing even in a
> >> > negative context, because we literary people no all about the evil
> >> > problems
> >> > contexts can cause.
> >> >
> >> > What more obvious place to seek evildoers than a Pynchon Club?  Of
> >> > course
> >> > we're being watched, observed, right?  We can't discuss where the Next
> >> > Big
> >> > Threat will be etc., because that will autiomatically raise
> suspicions.
> >> >  Why
> >> > are we discussing evildoing?  Hmm?  Even though everybody with half a
> >> > brain
> >> > knows that certain societies need periodic Big Threats to sustain
> >> > themselves.  And when was the last one in the Land of the
> FreedomLovers?
> >> >
> >> > A good Chomsky exercise in totalitarian-shutdown would be to start an
> >> > organization that studied where when and how would be the next big
> one,
> >> > and
> >> > then start investigating the who.  Accordingly to Noam, we'd all be
> fine
> >> > until somebody started paying attention to us.  And the thing is, all
> >> > eight
> >> > people on this list believes there's a lot more than eight people on
> >> > this
> >> > list watching, listening, sniffing around, paying attention to the
> >> > drunken
> >> > rants of longing souls.
> >> >
> >> > I was going to end with Zarathustra, but I see all that is available
> is
> >> > the
> >> > Common translation, nevermind.  On Redemption, was it, something
> about a
> >> > giant ear, Zarathustra wishing into it like some poor pining Mason for
> >> > his
> >> > Love?
> >> >
> >> > What is that about conscience, cruelty turned inward...?  Have our
> >> > rulers no
> >> > conscience?  No wait, no that's, that's way too ironic...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Madeleine Maudlin
> >> > <madeleinemaudlin at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Does anyone have an idea when where and how the Next Big Threat to
> >> >> freedomlovers is. going. to. be. and who will freedomlovers attack
> and
> >> >> invade.in.response.to.?
> >> >>
> >> >> For example, London, 2012, summer olympics, computer virus, Tibet.
> >> >>
> >> >> Aren't there websites where you can make those bets, what are some?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20120614/1cf2b32e/attachment.html>