threatdown

[Ray Easton]

:-)


On 6/14/12, Monte Davis <montedavis at verizon.net> wrote:
> Surely there are enough self-absorbed word-salading Dada wannabes in the
> world that that they don’t have to double up. Maybe rising sea levels have
> forced the evacuation of 4chan and alt.religion.kibology. Or maybe we’re
> just very, very lucky.
>
>
>
> From: owner-pynchon-l at waste.org [mailto:owner-pynchon-l at waste.org] On Behalf
> Of kelber at mindspring.com
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 3:58 PM
> To: pynchon-l at waste.org
> Subject: Re: threatdown
>
>
>
> If Madeleine says that (s)he is not Madeleine, then (s)he must be Iris.  Or
> Alice.  Or Terrence.  Or all of them.
>
>
>
> Laura
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Madeleine Maudlin
> Sent: Jun 14, 2012 3:53 PM
> To: David Morris
> Cc: Iris Sirius , P-list
> Subject: Re: threatdown
>
> It would be pathologickly insane to attempt to deceive literature experts by
> acting like two different characters.  Enki himself could not do so, even
> acting like Enlil.
>
>
>
> This is my only proof that obviously I am not Madeleine: I am not
> pathologickly insane.  Although her name does look fake.
>
>
>
> But you have reminded me of something that would be appropriate if your icky
> sockpuppet insinuation were true:
>
>
>
> "Your Honor, you are too clever for us naughty people."
>
>
>
> If me and Madeleine sound alike to you, well, sexist.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:37 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You two sure do sound like a pair of sock-puppets, one in each hand of
> the same person.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_(Internet)
>
> A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception. The
> term—a reference to the manipulation of a simple hand puppet made from
> a sock—originally referred to a false identity assumed by a member of
> an internet community who spoke to, or about himself while pretending
> to be another person.[1] The term now includes other uses of
> misleading online identities, such as those created to praise, defend
> or support a third party or organization.[2] A significant difference
> between the use of a pseudonym[3] and the creation of a sockpuppet is
> that the sockpuppet poses as an independent third-party unaffiliated
> with the puppeteer.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Iris Sirius <irissiriustce at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Nobody's interested in playing your paranoid fantasy games, Mad.  They're
>> too paranoid.  93% of the eight people on here know that nine eleven was
>> an
>> inside job, but the thing is, 911 worked, it made everybody afraid to be
>> associated with evildoers, so you can't talk about evildoing even in a
>> negative context, because we literary people no all about the evil
>> problems
>> contexts can cause.
>>
>> What more obvious place to seek evildoers than a Pynchon Club?  Of course
>> we're being watched, observed, right?  We can't discuss where the Next
>> Big
>> Threat will be etc., because that will autiomatically raise suspicions.
>> Why
>> are we discussing evildoing?  Hmm?  Even though everybody with half a
>> brain
>> knows that certain societies need periodic Big Threats to sustain
>> themselves.  And when was the last one in the Land of the FreedomLovers?
>>
>> A good Chomsky exercise in totalitarian-shutdown would be to start an
>> organization that studied where when and how would be the next big one,
>> and
>> then start investigating the who.  Accordingly to Noam, we'd all be fine
>> until somebody started paying attention to us.  And the thing is, all
>> eight
>> people on this list believes there's a lot more than eight people on this
>> list watching, listening, sniffing around, paying attention to the
>> drunken
>> rants of longing souls.
>>
>> I was going to end with Zarathustra, but I see all that is available is
>> the
>> Common translation, nevermind.  On Redemption, was it, something about a
>> giant ear, Zarathustra wishing into it like some poor pining Mason for
>> his
>> Love?
>>
>> What is that about conscience, cruelty turned inward...?  Have our rulers
>> no
>> conscience?  No wait, no that's, that's way too ironic...
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Madeleine Maudlin
>> <madeleinemaudlin at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Does anyone have an idea when where and how the Next Big Threat to
>>> freedomlovers is. going. to. be. and who will freedomlovers attack and
>>> invade.in.response.to.?
>>>
>>> For example, London, 2012, summer olympics, computer virus, Tibet.
>>>
>>> Aren't there websites where you can make those bets, what are some?
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>