threatdown

[Iris Sirius]

Self-absorbed, etc.?

I just got bitch-slapped by a person who I did not even know existed.
 Extrornery.

I never intend to ever insult or annoy or agitate people.  Appears that I
have.  And where there's one, there's probably more of them.  I'll leave.
 Me and, this lamp, and this chair...


On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Monte Davis <montedavis at verizon.net> wrote:

> Surely there are enough self-absorbed word-salading Dada wannabes in the
> world that that they don’t have to double up. Maybe rising sea levels have
> forced the evacuation of 4chan and alt.religion.kibology. Or maybe we’re
> just very, very lucky. ****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* owner-pynchon-l at waste.org [mailto:owner-pynchon-l at waste.org] *On
> Behalf Of *kelber at mindspring.com
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 14, 2012 3:58 PM
> *To:* pynchon-l at waste.org
> *Subject:* Re: threatdown****
>
> ** **
>
> If Madeleine says that (s)he is not Madeleine, then (s)he must be Iris.
>  Or Alice.  Or Terrence.  Or all of them.****
>
> ** **
>
> Laura****
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Madeleine Maudlin
> Sent: Jun 14, 2012 3:53 PM
> To: David Morris
> Cc: Iris Sirius , P-list
> Subject: Re: threatdown
>
> It would be pathologickly insane to attempt to deceive literature experts
> by acting like two different characters.  Enki himself could not do so,
> even acting like Enlil.****
>
> ** **
>
> This is my only proof that obviously I am not Madeleine: I am not
> pathologickly insane.  Although her name does look fake.****
>
> ** **
>
> But you have reminded me of something that would be appropriate if your
> icky sockpuppet insinuation were true:****
>
> ** **
>
> "Your Honor, you are too clever for us *naughty* people."****
>
> ** **
>
> If me and Madeleine sound alike to you, well, sexist.****
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:37 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:*
> ***
>
> You two sure do sound like a pair of sock-puppets, one in each hand of
> the same person.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_(Internet)
>
> A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception. The
> term—a reference to the manipulation of a simple hand puppet made from
> a sock—originally referred to a false identity assumed by a member of
> an internet community who spoke to, or about himself while pretending
> to be another person.[1] The term now includes other uses of
> misleading online identities, such as those created to praise, defend
> or support a third party or organization.[2] A significant difference
> between the use of a pseudonym[3] and the creation of a sockpuppet is
> that the sockpuppet poses as an independent third-party unaffiliated
> with the puppeteer.****
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Iris Sirius <irissiriustce at gmail.com>
> wrote:****
>
> > Nobody's interested in playing your paranoid fantasy games, Mad.  They're
> > too paranoid.  93% of the eight people on here know that nine eleven was
> an
> > inside job, but the thing is, 911 worked, it made everybody afraid to be
> > associated with evildoers, so you can't talk about evildoing even in a
> > negative context, because we literary people no all about the evil
> problems
> > contexts can cause.
> >
> > What more obvious place to seek evildoers than a Pynchon Club?  Of course
> > we're being watched, observed, right?  We can't discuss where the Next
> Big
> > Threat will be etc., because that will autiomatically raise suspicions.
>  Why
> > are we discussing evildoing?  Hmm?  Even though everybody with half a
> brain
> > knows that certain societies need periodic Big Threats to sustain
> > themselves.  And when was the last one in the Land of the FreedomLovers?
> >
> > A good Chomsky exercise in totalitarian-shutdown would be to start an
> > organization that studied where when and how would be the next big one,
> and
> > then start investigating the who.  Accordingly to Noam, we'd all be fine
> > until somebody started paying attention to us.  And the thing is, all
> eight
> > people on this list believes there's a lot more than eight people on this
> > list watching, listening, sniffing around, paying attention to the
> drunken
> > rants of longing souls.
> >
> > I was going to end with Zarathustra, but I see all that is available is
> the
> > Common translation, nevermind.  On Redemption, was it, something about a
> > giant ear, Zarathustra wishing into it like some poor pining Mason for
> his
> > Love?
> >
> > What is that about conscience, cruelty turned inward...?  Have our
> rulers no
> > conscience?  No wait, no that's, that's way too ironic...
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Madeleine Maudlin
> > <madeleinemaudlin at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Does anyone have an idea when where and how the Next Big Threat to
> >> freedomlovers is. going. to. be. and who will freedomlovers attack and
> >> invade.in.response.to.?
> >>
> >> For example, London, 2012, summer olympics, computer virus, Tibet.
> >>
> >> Aren't there websites where you can make those bets, what are some?
> >>
> >>
> >****
>
> ** **
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20120615/f47124df/attachment.html>