Rush

[Charles Albert]

No pun intended, but Feat stand alone....that said, here are a couple of
reasons to grant those singularly homely Canadians some props


(the comments on a live version of this suggested 55 time signature changes
in this piece)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OnxkfLe4G74

This never fails to inspire as I begin the last lap of my pec blasting
sessions, and contemplate 3 sets of 12 reps @ 115 lbs on the
bench.....pencilnecks are *made*, not born.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Kiz5jyG5j4

granted, a little Alan Holdsworth wouldn't hurt....

love,
cfa

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:52 PM, <malignd at aol.com> wrote:

> Well, they have a bad drummer.  That kills any band.   What else:  you
> think the lyrics are good? The playing?  Should I compare them, say, to
> Booker T and the MGs?  To Little Feat?
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Brawner <mark.brawner at gmail.com>
> To: malignd <malignd at aol.com>; pynchon -l <pynchon-l at waste.org>
> Sent: Thu, Jun 21, 2012 10:26 pm
> Subject: Re: Rush
>
>  On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:35 PM,  <malignd at aol.com> wrote:
> > You guys can't be serious.  This is Spinal Tap stuff, particularly (but by
> > no means only) the flat-footed drummer.  The guy's surrounded by a kit of
> > some fifty or so drums and he couldn't play drums on The Syncopated Clock.
> >  This is shit of the first order
>
> Awright, there, torquemada... I mean de gustibus and all that, but
> care to expand?
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20120622/b406d1f2/attachment.html>