P's Religion Or Why Take Revenge on Revenge Tragedy: The Living & the Dead ...an Interdependent Community
barbie gaze
barbiegaze at gmail.com
Mon Mar 5 05:07:38 CST 2012
1.
Such regular dramatic dilemmas are well-known, but their controversial
and religio-political import has received little attention. The dramatic
dilemmas reflect the age's religious dilemmas - as a sketch of the period's
religious developments in regard to the dead will illustrate. In R.A.
Bowyer's words, "The medieval church conceived of itself as a great
triangle of inter-dependent groups" in which "[t]he church on earth
supplied the membership of the church in purgatory and in heaven, and
relied on the help and intercession of the latter, while the souls in
purgatory looked to the church on earth for prayers and masses to expedite
their promotion to heaven, whence they would offer assistance to the church
on earth." * *Moreover, as Eamon Duffy points out, such theoretical
thinking manifested itself at the popular level of the man or woman on the
street. For late-medieval parishioners, funerals were "intensely concerned
with the notion of ... a community in which the living and the dead were
not separated," while the week-by-week recitation of the bede-role at
parish Masses reflect, as well as reinforced, a mentality in which the dead
remained "part of the communities they had once lived in."
2.
For theological reasons, during 'the English Reformation' this changed.
In Bowyer's words, the English church "formally severed diplomatic
relations with the Other World, ceasing to invoke the aid of the saints in
heaven, and ceasing to recognise its responsibility towards the souls of
the dead in purgatory." England's sixteenth-century journey from
Catholicism, through Lutheranism to Calvinism - according to Nicholas
Tyacke the characteristic theology of the English Church by 1600* *-
destroyed the idea that the living and the dead were an inter-dependent
community, Calvinism's doctrine of double predestination in particular
rendering the idea of praying for the dead redundant. Nor were such changes
limited to theory: in the Prayer Book of 1549 - to be used by church-goers
in their weekly attendance at service - congregations continued to speak to
the dead directly, but in the Prayer Book of 1552 all communication between
the living and the dead had disappeared. As Duffy puts it, "There is
nothing that could even be mistaken for a prayer for the dead in the 1552
rite." Though the Marian interval saw a brief reversal of such trends, in
Philip Morgan's stark phrase, from 1552 "The dead, it seemed, must shift
for themselves."
3.
To adapt Alan Sinfield's term, 1552 was a major 'faultline' of English
Renaissance history. Prior to that point, the dead and the living
officially inhabited the same community; after it the dead were officially
'beyond the grave.' This faultline is even seen reflected in the divided
mentalities of individuals. As late as 1642, Thomas Browne could write that
in younger days he had been tempted by a heresy "which I did never
positively maintain or practice, but have often wished ... had been
consonant with truth, and not offensive to my religion, and that is the
Prayer for the dead." Moreover, though he never "positively" practised such
prayer, Browne adds that he could "scarce contain my prayers for a friend
at the ringing of a bell," or even "behold a corpse without an orison for
his soul."
4.
What Browne's example illustrates is that however it was reppressed, the
originally medieval and Catholic view that the dead might remain part of
the community of the living continued in England - albeit as a social
undertone - well into the seventeenth century: if England's official
religion no longer recognised the community of the dead as its own,
individuals - even Protestant individuals - still to some extent did.
Notice, moreover, how by reflecting acts of public suppression such private
acts of repression imply the period's religious controversies: in 1629, for
example, the Bishop of Carlisle was still trying to eradicate "praying for
the dead at crosses ... or any other superstitious use of crosses, with
towels, palms ... or other memories of idolatory at burials." Similarly
Browne refrains from traditional impulses toward the dead because - as he
is conscious - they are "offensive to my religion."
5.
Such religious sensitivity and controversy requires elucidation. Browne
is responding specifically to the rise of an Anglican 'Via Media' and
therefore to particularly Protestant influences, but the Via Media itself
represents an attempt to create a Protestantism closer to (though by no
means identical with) Roman Catholicism. As Christopher Haigh pointes out,
such movement and figures were widely perceived by less moderate sections
of the populace to be 'popish.' Indeed, the frequency with which that term
was bandied around in the period is further evidence of contemporary
Protestant concern with the insidious effects of such persistent 'Catholic'
beliefs. Even Elizabeth's Archbishop of Canterbury John Whitgift - a
clearly Protestant figure - could be popularly referred to as "the Pope of
Lambeth."
6.
By repeatedly staging the dead on earth - and by inviting audiences to
wonder at their reality and meaning - English Renaissance ghost plays, and
particularly Revenge tragedies - so often set in continental, and so
ostensibly Catholic, Europe - thus reflect on and intervene in the period's
personally felt and key religious controversies over the dead. We do not
need to know whether in *Hamlet* the ghost is telling the truth about
Purgatory: by merely suggesting that the dead remained close to the
community of the living, plays like *Hamlet* engaged with a central
difference between Catholics and Protestants - as, derivatively, between
Protestants - and the means by which they did so suggest the uncertainties
and ideological differences of their authors. This broad picture of a
considerable body of English Renaissance drama as enacted controversy is
also illustrated in the detail of plays like *The White Devil* and *The
Duchess of Malfi*.
7.
http://extra.shu.ac.uk/emls/09-1/ristdead.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20120305/33e5b3a5/attachment.html>
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list