GR 156-170, colors, compounds

[Michael Bailey]

 Bled Welder wrote:
> I actually know the answer to that: before.
>
> Regarding "seig heil" after the fact, he said it was an "error in Being."
>

I'm inclined to dismiss everything he said philosophically before
embracing Nazism as leading up to it, and everything after as stemming
from it...

I admit this may be a fairly ignorant response, but the insufficiency
of his recantation doesn't prompt any impulse in me to revise it.
What do people look for in a philosopher in the first place?  what is
good, what is true, right?  and if his philosophy couldn't even weed
out Nazism, it can't be very good.