In Which Jung prewrites AtD's epigraph

[bandwraith at aol.com]

And what's love got to do with it, anyway...


-----Original Message-----
From: bandwraith <bandwraith at aol.com>
To: brook7 <brook7 at sover.net>; pynchon-l <pynchon-l at waste.org>
Sent: Thu, Mar 15, 2012 11:26 pm
Subject: Re: In Which Jung prewrites AtD's epigraph


But do you imagine that thought is something
more than a physical process, or just some
physically embodied process that is way too
complex and self-referential to program from
the top down?


-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Tracy <brook7 at sover.net>
To: P-list List <pynchon-l at waste.org>
Sent: Thu, Mar 15, 2012 2:25 pm
Subject: Re: In Which Jung prewrites AtD's epigraph


I personally think every prediction of AI so far is absurdly premature.
The
premise still seems fundamentally bizarre to me. I just can't imagine
self
generated thought apart from the kind of innate will that comes with
being in a
bodily form with natural desires attributes and limits. The idea that
you can
program curiosity, or desire to formulate and solve a problem into an
electronic
device designed only to process  binary code just seems real iffy.