(np) big O, say it isn't so...

[Bled Welder]

It may be interesting to consider, in a political type context, regarding
concerns about nature floating about that do not adhere to the generally
narrow-minded stance of normal solid mathematical particle field physics,
that Chomsky's Propaganda Model might work as well with the scientific
community as it does with the media.  Anything suggested outside the
self-defined limits of the community is both ridiculed as lunacy and
necessarily not understood.

This just crossed my mind.  I'm sure Nader is well aware of this.

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Michael Bailey <
michael.lee.bailey at gmail.com> wrote:

> isn't the term "shoo-in" - as, like, waving them on in ("shoo" like
> "shoo fly") without significant barriers?
>
>
> anyway, Bush STILL wouldn't have won in 2000 without heavy cheating.
>
> And as Michael Moore pointed out, Nader could have brokered some
> influence for Green issues in 2000, assuming maybe 25% of Greens might
> have voted for Gore in swing states if he'd requested it.
>
> He personally was not smart enough to do that, but that doesn't
> invalidate 3rd parties for all time.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20120327/c462e868/attachment.html>