Speaking of Carl Jung
Jed Kelestron
jedkelestron at gmail.com
Wed Mar 28 08:28:06 CDT 2012
You need to read the source directly to have an informed opinion of the body of work. That's all. I have no use for Freud or Jung but I've read them both extensively while not reading much by others about them.
On Mar 28, 2012, at 6:12 AM, Matthew Cissell <macissell at yahoo.es> wrote:
> How much do I need to read before I see his genius? Maybe the Red Book will straighten things out for me. Or maybe he'll just seem more whacked out. You got that big red book?
> Nothing personal, I don't hold much stock in Freud either.
>
> MC Otis
>
>
>
> From: Jed Kelestron <jedkelestron at gmail.com>
> To: Matthew Cissell <macissell at yahoo.es>
> Cc: "pynchon-l at waste.org" <pynchon-l at waste.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 7:44 AM
> Subject: Re: Speaking of Carl Jung
>
> I'll bet you haven't read much if any of Jung's collected works.
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Matthew Cissell <macissell at yahoo.es> wrote:
> I guess I don't see what Jung did "right" so I can't
> > merit praise by assimilating his work.
> >
> > mc otis
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20120328/d7a6d147/attachment.html>
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list