Speaking of Carl Jung

[Jed Kelestron]

You need to read the source directly to have an informed opinion of the body of work. That's all. I have no use for Freud or Jung but I've read them both extensively while not reading much by others about them. 



On Mar 28, 2012, at 6:12 AM, Matthew Cissell <macissell at yahoo.es> wrote:

> How much do I need to read before I see his genius? Maybe the Red Book will straighten things out for me. Or maybe he'll just seem more whacked out. You got that big red book?
>     Nothing personal, I don't hold much stock in Freud either.
>  
> MC Otis
>  
>     
>   
> From: Jed Kelestron <jedkelestron at gmail.com>
> To: Matthew Cissell <macissell at yahoo.es> 
> Cc: "pynchon-l at waste.org" <pynchon-l at waste.org> 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 7:44 AM
> Subject: Re: Speaking of Carl Jung
> 
> I'll bet you haven't read much if any of Jung's collected works.
> 
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Matthew Cissell <macissell at yahoo.es> wrote:
> I guess I don't see what Jung did "right" so I can't
> > merit praise by assimilating his work.
> >
> > mc otis
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20120328/d7a6d147/attachment.html>