Speaking of Carl Jung

[Jed Kelestron]

Volumes 9, 12, 13, and 14 of the Collected Works are fantastic. But I
think Nabokov's Ada is fantastic. And I read Jung as fiction not
"psychology." Not that there is any difference of course.

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:28 AM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
> The Red Book is beautiful art.
>
> The Collected Works are hard work, but rewarding.  Have you read it?
> It's an honest question.
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Matthew Cissell <macissell at yahoo.es> wrote:
>> How much do I need to read before I see his genius? Maybe the Red Book will
>> straighten things out for me. Or maybe he'll just seem more whacked out. You
>> got that big red book?
>>     Nothing personal, I don't hold much stock in Freud either.
>>
>> MC Otis
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Jed Kelestron <jedkelestron at gmail.com>
>> To: Matthew Cissell <macissell at yahoo.es>
>> Cc: "pynchon-l at waste.org" <pynchon-l at waste.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 7:44 AM
>> Subject: Re: Speaking of Carl Jung
>>
>> I'll bet you haven't read much if any of Jung's collected works.
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Matthew Cissell <macissell at yahoo.es>
>> wrote:
>> I guess I don't see what Jung did "right" so I can't
>>> merit praise by assimilating his work.
>>>
>>> mc otis
>>
>>