Five Works of Theory You Should Consider Reading

[Michael Fonash]

Sincerely, not to be an antagonistic prick, but I have to ask, why is
Literary Theory necessary at all?  I've never understood it's presence
in the contemporary university.

Mike F.

On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Mark Kohut <markekohut at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Cioran is worth reading and Stupidity, about which I learned of from a
> generally quiet
> plister, is a good book.
>
>
>
> From: Dave Monroe <against.the.dave at gmail.com>
> To: Matthew Cissell <macissell at yahoo.es>
> Cc: "pynchon-l at waste.org" <pynchon-l at waste.org>
> Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2012 1:59 PM
> Subject: Re: Five Works of Theory You Should Consider Reading
>
> On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Matthew Cissell <macissell at yahoo.es> wrote:
>
>> Did this get forwarded because of the Pynchon mention?
>
> .... I'm thinking maybe Werner might have come across is for that
> reason (I got it from him, he posted it on Google+), it just seemed
> like a useful/possibly relevant, even, selection to me, is all.  All
> worth reading, depending, regardless of the blogger's
> descriptions/credentials/whatever.  I was particularly gald to see nt
> only Glas, but Syncope (though The Parasite, maybe Crack Wars,
> poissibly Borderlands might be more/most relevant here) ...
>
>