beware the markkohut! / was Re: pynchon-l-digest V2 #9197

[Michael Bailey]

yeahp, that Mark Kohut is a caution...
he will whip you like a rented mule
he will drop you like a bad transmission
he will beat you like Joe Jackson used to beat Michael...

("do not fuck with the Kid, lest instead of fucker, thou become
fuckee!")(as Major Marvy, wasn't it, said in GR)

On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Bled Welder <bledwelder at gmail.com> wrote:
> Holy mother of god, are you insane?  You never, never, never mention
> Candlebrow U. here.  Are you fucking loonitoons?  Are you the dumbest person
> here, ever?  And that's saying a lot.
>
> Mr. Kohut will destroy you.
>
> In fact, you're as good as gone.  Mr. Kohut is going to pick you up, and
> just destroy you.
>
> I knew, I knew when I quit this idiotbox that is the dwelling of world-class
> tedium that is this, that is hogged by dwarf intellects like All Is Well In
> Town, that, what you do is you kinda keep an eye on it, you don't read the
> stuff, but occasionally you click on something and glance at it, why is this
> place populated with literary critics, as opposed to say, interesting
> people, god knows, no doubt, but to get on with it, what was I saying, oh,
> you, you collossal nincompoop, why did I click on you, I knew, I just knew
> it, that one day this would happen, and I'd get sucked into the abyss
> again....
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Don Antenen <dantenen at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> I study at Penn, and I know people doing a Gravity's Rainbow class right
>> now. So there's still some Pynchon in the Ivy League...
>>
>> all the best,
>> Don
>>
>> On Oct 12, 2012, at 11:32 AM, Paul Mackin <mackin.paul at verizon.net> wrote:
>>
>> > On 10/12/2012 11:03 AM, Matthew Cissell wrote:
>> >> It would make an interesting study to compare Wood's reading of A
>> >> Sentime=
>> ntal Education with Bourdieu's. Mr Wood is fair enough when addressing the
>> f=
>> ormal aspects of fiction, its mechanics if you will, but does that
>> surprise a=
>> nyone? He studied under Kermode, he's an Oxford chap. If we agree with his
>> c=
>> ategories and judgements that is likely because, to some degree, we share
>> hi=
>> s orthodoxy.
>> >=20
>> > Here's a question:  How does one account for the more conservative
>> > literar=
>> y values associated with Oxford as compared with, say, Sussex, where
>> Pynchon=
>> studies seem to be going strong?  I can't remember ever hearing P's name
>> me=
>> ntioned in connection with Oxbridge.  Same in America with the Ivy League.
>> I=
>> t can't be a class thing, because smart poor kids have be going everywhere
>> s=
>> ince WWII.  It's just that tradition dies hard I suppose.  Or what?
>> >=20
>> > P
>
>



-- 
- where the bee sucks, there suck I