Author Roth rebukes Wikipedia over Human Stain edit

Mark Kohut markekohut at yahoo.com
Sat Sep 8 13:20:04 CDT 2012


Roth doesn't--didn't--get wikipedia. 
 
Check out wikipedia. Now that his letter is printed in
The New Yorker it can be cited!. Nice self-refuting, wikipedia-
firmness resolution.
 
And, as someone has pointed out, Roth did not tell the same story in the
Bloomberg interview cited within the article. 
 
Ye Olde Unreliable Narrator. 
 
 
 

________________________________
 From: Dave Monroe <against.the.dave at gmail.com>
To: pynchon -l <pynchon-l at waste.org> 
Sent: Saturday, September 8, 2012 12:05 PM
Subject: Author Roth rebukes Wikipedia over Human Stain edit
  
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-19527797

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Human_Stain
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20120908/59c0aa44/attachment.html>


More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list