Today's discussion question

[alice wellintown]

Sometimes Bacon goes best with Dregs. So here, Arisitole is needed to
avoid the obvious miscategorization, a logical fallacy.

Also, the combination of collapsing definitions and Malthusian math is absurd.

Looking at the world, the argument would agree with those who want to
nuke China.

BTW, Malthus wasa jolly soul. So....

On 8/23/13, Joseph Tracy <brook7 at sover.net> wrote:
> I am not at all convinced that something like violence is really measurable
> in a meaningful way.  Starvation and malnutrition in a world of food plenty
> involves a kind of violence, as is the lack of medicines for the poor.The US
> has the largest military in human history and at 5% of the population
> consumes 24% of the energy. Similar pattern in other resources. There is a
> clear relation between the guns and the distributon of resources that is
> fundamentally violent.
> Fracking is violence against people, against the waters, against the future.
> The ocean is being depleted of life and acidifying. Cancer rates grow with
> the toxins in the ecosystem
> One could find many similar patterns which are subtle but very real forms of
> violence. And if iraq is the first volley in global resource wars  and the
> effects of global warming are as bad as predicted we may see waves of
> violence that will make this book look premature.
>  How do you measure the intimidation produced by Abhu Graibh, Global NSA
> surveillance and the the crackdown on investigative journalism which exposes
> the lies and violence of the government?
>
> Here is the thing. I am not saying people are getting more violent. I think
> the vast majority of humans are not willing or interested to participate in
> acts of violence, but we are easily seduced to take up habits of consumption
> that are inherently reliant on violence.  I think it is quite evident that
> the concentration of wealth and power in military financial and corporate
> power structures has increased the underlying violence of human life on
> earth and multiplied its destructiveness  of those who would exploit others
> for gain. The potential for massive global violence is increasing, not
> decreasing, because of that concentration. The NSA spy network is not about
> Jihad, it is about defending the castle from the Hottentots.
>
> Today my wife works for a generous and kind man who is in his late 70s and
> very well off. He worked on the Genome project.  He told her he was deeply
> fearful about the world his grandchildren will live in. I feel the same way.
> J???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
> On Aug 22, 2013, at 12:25 PM, Bekah wrote:
>
>> But today we are horrified by slavery anywhere.  Today we abhor many
>> things that centuries ago,  or decades for that matter,  were taken as a
>> matter of course -  lynchings for example,  but also direct warfare
>> between major powers,  capital punishment (in most of the western world,
>> anyway),  the abuse of women, children, ethnic minorities, gays,  - even
>> of animals.
>>
>> Steven Pinker's book,  The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has
>> Declined [2011],  is flawed in many respects,  but he makes some
>> interesting points.
>>
>> That said,   I'm not taking a side here because I think capitalism and
>> elements of fascism play into the equation.  Otoh,  the devastation of
>> Hiroshima and the atrocities of the Holocaust had an impact.
>>
>> Bekah
>>
>>
>> On Aug 22, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Joseph Tracy <brook7 at sover.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes . Very reasonable points about our collective abilities. But my
>>> argument is that we often ascribe to ourselves as individuals what we
>>> only have as part of a system. The gap between the wisdom of moderns and
>>> the wisdom of the ancients still seems more self congratulatory than
>>> substantive.  The young girls that make shirts in nasty and dangerous
>>> factories in Pakistan seem little different than slaves. As far as the
>>> status of women, this freedom has not been extended to other cultures
>>> colonized by the Euro and patriarchal powers in the same way as to the
>>> wives and daughters and mothers of the democracies. The link between
>>> "our" purportedly enlightened and technically advanced system and crude
>>> forms of exploitation that rival any in history is shown in the factory
>>> conditions of people making parts for Apple products.
>>>
>>> I am not saying people used to be wiser. I am arguing for realistic
>>> humility in claims to advancement, because so much of the history of that
>>> advancement has been directly at the expense of  militarily and
>>> culturally vulnerable cultures. In these kinds of advancements there is
>>> as much injury and loss as advance.
>>>
>>> We inherit through the written word and technology a tremendous
>>> inheritance of potential wisdom and possibility, but we also inherit some
>>> really destructive habits and colonialist historic patterns that are
>>> built around treating the biosphere and its inhabitants as a can of
>>> materials to be mined, used and discarded.  What I see is more of a
>>> runaway train than a wise, sustainable  and advanced modern culture. We
>>> are generating powerful warnings and solutions but so far they are not
>>> really slowing the destructive juggernaut. I hope I am wrong and that
>>> what we are going through now will as you also hope enable and compel the
>>> changes that are needed.  I am just really saying that some humility is
>>> in order and is part of the needed change.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 21, 2013, at 12:05 PM, Ian Livingston wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am loathe to take issue with you Joseph, I agree in so many ways, but
>>>> there are a couple of points I want to add to color your choler with.
>>>> First, the "we" thing. As regards your examples of things we can and
>>>> cannot do, "we" can build computers and cell phones and such. I can't
>>>> make the entire product, you can't, and neither can he or she, but they
>>>> can, and we can do things they cannot. I've worked making the batteries
>>>> for tech devices in the past, for example, which is something Bill Gates
>>>> couldn't do. Among the things we can't do are making an axe from chert
>>>> and wood; using the entire carcass of an animal we have killed with a
>>>> bow and arrow, or atlatl, or snare we likewise could not have made; we
>>>> couldn't build a castle of stone that can stand for a year, much less
>>>> for 500 or a 1000 years. We no longer have the skills to live in the
>>>> ways that the people among whom the wisdom traditions evolved did;
>>>> still, as you say, we could certainly learn skills from them. Could we
>>>> learn to keep slaves as they did? To demean and disempower women as they
>>>> did? To leave the weak to suffer and die as they did? Well, obviously
>>>> "we" can, but could you? Could I?
>>>>
>>>> Permaculture, peak oil communities, intentional communities, etc., are
>>>> all good starts toward building the sort of post-industrial, neo-tribal
>>>> communities that might have a chance at replacing the contemporary
>>>> disaster, but they have yet to find the middle ground that still allows
>>>> the scientific advancement, and the development of fabrication skills
>>>> that can help us live lightly, usefully, and harmoniously in an unarmed
>>>> paradise. Those communities are cutting the way that might lead to the
>>>> development of the intellectual and intentional bases necessary to
>>>> advances we can hope might lead us toward living on the land in a
>>>> realistic way. It is probable that population counts will have to come
>>>> down a bit to make such meaningful living viable on the large scale, but
>>>> it could happen.
>>>>
>>>> It just couldn't happen in our time or without going through what we are
>>>> going through now.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Joseph Tracy <brook7 at sover.net> wrote:
>>>> Even the most technically advanced modern cultures still sacrifice the
>>>> young for idiotic lies. The humanity of the high priests of culture has
>>>> always been a crapshoot.  Your idea that anyone who has a different
>>>> frame of technological reference has nothing they could teach you was
>>>> shared by the crew of the Franklin polar expedition who refused the maps
>>>> and aid of Inuit people and perished.
>>>> Currently we are faced with a global ecological crisis founded in our
>>>> own technologies and habitual addictions and some pretty stupid
>>>> presumptions. One of the most intriguing alternative paths is
>>>> permaculture which is largely drawn from tribal patterns of survival
>>>> through the knowledge and cultivation of local resources,  combined with
>>>> science and technology. That seems a legitimate example of mutual
>>>> respectful interaction.
>>>>
>>>> As far as "we" knowing so much, I'm not so sure.  How many of 'us' could
>>>> design/build an ac power plant, a computer, a cell phone, an electric
>>>> motor or refrigerator. Most people, probably 90 to 99 percent really
>>>> don't know enough to do so, though many have some small subset of such
>>>> knowledge.  There is something slightly false about crediting ourselves
>>>> with the cumulative benefits of scientific qnd technological inquiry.
>>>> On Aug 20, 2013, at 5:43 PM, MalignD at aol.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Proud vaunting"?  "False pride"?  Please.  We know a thousand times
>>>>> more now than we did a thousand years ago.  That's simply true.
>>>>> Certainly people weren't stupider, but the idea that their ignorance
>>>>> provided a shortcut to some deeper truth is romantic silliness.  They
>>>>> sacrificed animals, virgins, children as a result of their "knowledge."
>>>>>  Later, they leeched the humors from people, racked and burned people
>>>>> for superstitious heresies.  Etc., etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> It was a stunning achievement, once, to lash a sharp stone to a tree
>>>>> limb and make a spear.  But you think the person who did that has
>>>>> lessons to teach us.  I don't.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Halliburton of the holy house of halitosis."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm still laughing over that ...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This proud vaunting of ones culture, knowledge and modernness as
>>>>> displaying a
>>>>> superior mentality is something I see as false pride.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Joseph Tracy <brook7 at sover.net>
>>>>> To: P-list List <pynchon-l at waste.org>
>>>>> Sent: Tue, Aug 20, 2013 1:13 pm
>>>>> Subject: Re: Today's discussion question
>>>>>
>>>>> This proud vaunting of ones culture, knowledge and modernness as
>>>>> displaying a
>>>>> superior mentality is something I see as false pride. No matter how far
>>>>> back in
>>>>> any culture one goes there are stunning technical achievements,
>>>>> beautiful,
>>>>> subtle and relevant poetry and a fulsome array of all that is human
>>>>> and
>>>>> delightful along with what is dark and cruel. I see little evidence
>>>>> that our
>>>>> technical abilities have freed us from cruel military empires, idiotic
>>>>> lies etc.
>>>>> Long life? What is the glory of vast numbers of fat TV watchers waiting
>>>>> for
>>>>> death.
>>>>>
>>>>> As far as moderns wanting experience and reliable information over
>>>>> dogmatic
>>>>> constructs, come again? Facts like evil Iraqis with weapons of mass
>>>>> destruction,
>>>>> weapons of mass destruction , weapons of mass destruction, weapons of
>>>>> mass
>>>>> destruction.  Facts like a world suddenly filled with terrorists and
>>>>> requiring
>>>>> the imperial suspension of civil rights.  Facts like Fracking is
>>>>> perfectly safe,
>>>>> here, have a drink. The invisible hand of the marketplace is even now
>>>>> ending
>>>>> hunger and making the world better every minute; that isn't dogma,
>>>>> thats true as
>>>>> even now Democracy spreads throughout the middle east with her
>>>>> friendly
>>>>> handmaidens dronella, starvation sanctionlalla, and Halliburton of the
>>>>> holy
>>>>> house of halitosis. I too am proud to be a modern man. Have a high
>>>>> powered
>>>>> semi-automatic my child. It is your precious birthright and the
>>>>> solidest of
>>>>> facts. It comes with a credit card backed by Ben Bernanke's personal
>>>>> endorsement. Spend freely and kill with pride for thou art blessed with
>>>>> stars
>>>>> and stripes up every fucking orifice.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 19, 2013, at 6:05 PM,
>>>>> MalignD at aol.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It always strikes me that, when people speak of the ancient wisdom
>>>>>> they
>>>>> picture elders and sages, wise and wizened men possessed of some deep,
>>>>> now lost,
>>>>> knowledge.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> These were bronze age people with little but superstition to direct
>>>>>> them past
>>>>> their ignorance and fear and most of them were dead before they were
>>>>> fifty.
>>>>>> no ancient or
>>>>>> childlike trust in the elders or the prophets or whatever the sages
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> old handed down, what the scibes writ will do.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: David Morris <
>>>>> fqmorris at gmail.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To: alice wellintown <
>>>>> alicewellintown at gmail.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cc: pynchon -l <
>>>>> pynchon-l at waste.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent: Fri, Aug 16, 2013 10:01 pm
>>>>>> Subject: Re: Today's discussion question
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well said, Alice.  AND so succinct!  Huzzah!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Friday, August 16, 2013, alice wellintown wrote:
>>>>>> He will never encounter anything that will persuade you, MalignD, but
>>>>>> he may have an experience that will, as it has others, persuade him.
>>>>>> Of course, such experiences are the foundation of modern adaptatons
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> traditional religions. In other words, an immediate awareness of
>>>>>> relation with a decine presense or mysticism.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because modern peoples are weary of ancient traditions, and because
>>>>>> modern peoples have built and discovered modern ways, no ancient or
>>>>>> childlike trust in the elders or the prophets or whatever the sages
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> old handed down, what the scibes writ will do. We want facts. We
>>>>>> don't
>>>>>> want authority. We want experience not dogmatic constructs. So the
>>>>>> mystical religion, that is, religion grounded in experience. So, if
>>>>>> one looks for evidence of reincarnation or resurrection or grace, one
>>>>>> may find it in experience.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Will it ever happen for for YOU?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not even MalignD can can say.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 8/16/13,
>>>>> malignd at aol.com <malignd at aol.com
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Nor will you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've never encountered anything like persuasive evidence of
>>>>>>> reincarnation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: Ian Livingston <
>>>>> igrlivingston at gmail.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To: David Morris <
>>>>> fqmorris at gmail.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cc: Bekah <
>>>>> bekah0176 at sbcglobal.net>; malignd <malignd at aol.com
>>>>>> ; pynchon-l
>>>>>>> <
>>>>> pynchon-l at waste.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sent: Thu, Aug 15, 2013 9:44 pm
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Today's discussion question
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, the (Tibetan Mahayana) Buddhist model is not limited to this
>>>>>>> world.
>>>>>>> There are myriad other worlds in Samsara. We're only passing through
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>> one, en route to eventual enlightenment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've never encountered anything like persuasive evidence of
>>>>>>> reincarnation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 6:33 PM, David Morris <
>>>>> fqmorris at gmail.com
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would like to see a math model of just the human accounting on how
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> present exploding population works with retreaded souls as a ratio of
>>>>>>> new to
>>>>>>> old.  There must be a huge source of new human souls yet to go
>>>>>>> spinning on
>>>>>>> this Merry-Go-Round.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thursday, August 15, 2013, Bekah  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If reincarnation is true there are a whole lot of dead people waiting
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>> another shot at life - either that or they've come back as
>>>>>>> cockroaches -  in
>>>>>>> which case I suspect we have extra lives coming from somewhere.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just don't see how the accounting works out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=fact-or-fiction-living-outnumber-dead
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bek
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Aug 15, 2013, at 3:53 PM, David Morris <
>>>>> fqmorris at gmail.com
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The concept of reincarnation long predates the advent of Buddhism
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>> India.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't find it useful, since access to lessons learned in a
>>>>>>>> previous
>>>>>>>> lives isn't common nor plausible when through hypnosis people recall
>>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>>> Napoleon or Cleopatra. If there is a kernel of truth in the concept
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> reincarnation it seems to me useful as a way to understand inherent
>>>>>>>> knowledge, instincts, in every living being, passed on via eons of
>>>>>>>> evolution. Collective Conciousness?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> David Morris
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thursday, August 15, 2013, wrote:
>>>>>>>> It's not remotely plausible.  Where would you suggest this
>>>>>>>> "knowledge"
>>>>>>>> comes from?
>>>>>>>> The idea that the Tibetans
>>>>>>>> know something in regard to reincarnation that we don't seems
>>>>>>>> perfectly
>>>>>>>> plausible.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>> From: Joseph Tracy <
>>>>> brook7 at sover.net
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To: P-list List <
>>>>> pynchon-l at waste.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sent: Thu, Aug 15, 2013 11:16 am
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Today's discussion question
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Unless it is true. This idea has been around for a long time and has
>>>>>>>> had
>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>> non bubble headed proponents who may perceive things unseen by a
>>>>>>>> certain
>>>>>>>> kind of
>>>>>>>> logic. I am agnostic on all questions that seek to definitively
>>>>>>>> describe
>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>> dimensions of experience, but some of my own experiences have kept
>>>>>>>> me
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>> closing the door on this and I do not find that leaving the question
>>>>>>>> open
>>>>>>>> induces any more bubble headedness than watching TV. The idea that
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> Tibetans
>>>>>>>> know something in regard to reincarnation
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>