this is entirely true

[Indel Icate]

That would depend on your definition of plural.

If you mean by plurality something multiple in its coming equations, then
you can see that the disembodiment of the two towers was a form of single
orgasm.


On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:11 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:

> The voids don't look vagina-like to me.  And there are two of them, plural.
>
>
> On Tuesday, December 31, 2013, Indel Icate wrote:
>
>> Tis true, my love.
>>
>> Like blue fingerprints on a piano, we are being.
>>
>> Scaled. Octave by octave. Tower by tower.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Keith Davis <kbob42 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Interesting post. Where do you get the info that the "towers were built
>>> solely to be destroyed by their makers"? I never thought of it that way,
>>> but it makes perfect sense, if true.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Indel Icate <
>>> indelicateexplasions at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think, if I remember correct, I've read this Pynchon fellow.  And I
>>>> knew about this list, to such an extent I considered coming here onto this
>>>> Babble-On, and Lo! disincovered, uncovered, in the process, that the old
>>>> fiend has written some other, further-going mindless displeasure about the
>>>> 911 debacle.
>>>>
>>>> My only question is, surely the man knows full well that the two towers
>>>> were built solely to be destroyed by their makers.  Does he address that,
>>>> in the book, or does he pussyfoot around the gaping vagina that is "ground
>>>> zero" like a pussy in black loathing?  Clothing.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> www.innergroovemusic.com
>>>
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20131231/1948b44a/attachment.html>