Bleeding Edge takes place in 2001
John Bailey
sundayjb at gmail.com
Tue Feb 26 05:28:36 CST 2013
Oops, forgot to reply all.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:27 PM, John Bailey <sundayjb at gmail.com> wrote:
> V., COL49 and Vineland are the closest to contemporaneous, right?
> Vineland was published in 1990 and set in 1984, so it might be the
> most relevant comparison here, maybe? Is what I'm now thinking. I
> imagine it came together in the mid to late 80s. And Bleeding Edge
> might have been percolating for around the same time recently, though
> all probably have threads reaching back to whoever knows when.
>
> What really interests me is the way the 2001 setting of BE feels so
> current, when in fact it's more 'historical' than some of Pynchon's
> other novels.
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Heikki Raudaskoski
> <hraudask at sun3.oulu.fi> wrote:
>>
>>
>> William Slothrop and Kekule also come to mind from earlier centuries.
>> But yeah, there isn't that much century hopping in GR.
>>
>> I just realized that the main bulk of V.'s framing narrative is also
>> set in the NYC of the former decade.
>>
>> In V., the framing narrative acts as something of a sounding board
>> for the historical chapters. It remains to be seen if BE bears some
>> similarity to V. in this respect too.
>>
>>
>> Heikki
>>
>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 kelber at mindspring.com wrote:
>>
>>> You're absolutely right! Now I'm wracking my brain to think of all the
>>> sequences is GR and ATD. LK
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Antonin Scriabin
>>> Sent: Feb 25, 2013 7:16 PM
>>> To: kelber at mindspring.com
>>> Cc: pynchon-l at waste.org
>>> Subject: Re: Bleeding Edge takes place in 2001
>>>
>>> Well V. takes place in the late 19th and early 20th
>>> centuries, if I am not mistaken. Mason & Dixon is a purely
>>> 18th century affair, barring Vulcans.
>>>
>>> On Feb 25, 2013 7:08 PM, <kelber at mindspring.com> wrote:
>>> ATD spanned two centuries, late and early, and
>>> it's hard to see how anyone could write about
>>> 2001, without referencing back into the previous
>>> century. Aside from a brief hop back to the
>>> demise of the dodos, doesn't GR (and all the
>>> others) remain in a single century? Previous
>>> centuries are talked about in COL49, but we don't
>>> actually go there. Any other instances of
>>> intra-book century hopping that I'm forgetting?
>>> Laura
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Antonin Scriabin
>>> Sent: Feb 25, 2013 6:56 PM
>>> To: kelber at mindspring.com
>>> Cc: pynchon-l at waste.org
>>> Subject: Re: Bleeding Edge takes place in 2001
>>>
>>> Something tells me we won't be in this century
>>> for long, or to the exclusion of other centuries.
>>>
>>> On Feb 25, 2013 6:34 PM, <kelber at mindspring.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> Oops! Working through earlier
>>> emails, I see this was already
>>> posted. Exciting news, anyway. With
>>> all his zigzagging (yoyoing?) back
>>> and forth in time, he's finally
>>> arrived in our century.
>>>
>>> Laura
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> >From: kelber at mindspring.com
>>> >Sent: Feb 25, 2013 6:22 PM
>>> >To: pynchon-l at waste.org
>>> >Subject: Bleeding Edge takes place
>>> in 2001
>>> >
>>> >Dave Monroe posted this on Facebook,
>>> but hasn't posted it here yet. Dave?
>>> Dave?! Are you here? Great find!
>>> >
>>> >
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/entertainment/2013/02/thomas-pynchon-new-book-bl
>>> eeding-edge/62483/
>>> >
>>> >"The book is about the early 21st
>>> century tech scene in New York City.
>>> According to the log line from the
>>> reports' preview, "it is 2001 in
>>> Silicon Alley, New York City, in the
>>> lull between the collapse of the
>>> dot-com boom and the terrible events
>>> of September 11."
>>> >
>>> >Laura
>>>
>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20130226/42e4ce1b/attachment.html>
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list