911 Prewarning

[Lemuel Underwing]

Was malignd one of them? That does kind of make sense.

I've blocked Mad-a-line, and Bled. At first I just felt sorry for him/her
because there's obviously some Problems there,
it got to be too much however.

Seriously I can't be the only one who Noticed Michelle Obama, her Royal
Highness, backed by Dress Uniforms.
Don't get me wrong I'm sure Michelle is as innocent as a dove, all it takes
is Someone to suggest the idea.

Les Mis was the best movie of the year, but what Political Message does it
have?
No, Argo, that Hitchcock-o-fied B-plus-Movie and its endearing Plot of
"White Americans in Trouble" is far more Palatable,
and gets the Royal Nod.

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:55 PM, <malignd at aol.com> wrote:

> I have no alternate personalities -- don't know what would qualify them as
> little -- and I post only to the p-list.  Problem seems to be with your
> shitty email software.
>
> Malignd.... why the hell are you and all your little alternate
> personalities showing up in my inbox? I thought I blocked you...
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ludd oafery <recoignishon at gmail.com>
> To: malignd <malignd at aol.com>
> Cc: pynchon -l <pynchon-l at waste.org>
> Sent: Wed, Feb 27, 2013 5:48 pm
> Subject: Re: 911 Prewarning
>
>  Malignd.... why the hell are you and all your little alternate
> personalities showing up in my inbox? I thought I blocked you...
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:46 PM, <malignd at aol.com> wrote:
>
>> another loon.
>>
>>
>>  2.  Why did a mediocre, forgettable movie like Argo sweep all the
>> awards ceremony, get a personal well-wish by new Secretary of State John
>> Kerry, and finally get personally awarded the Best Picture Oscar by
>> Michelle Obama?  My conspiracy theory: State Department/Pentagon
>> strong-armed all of the Hollywood power-brokers (not all of who, by the
>> way, are Jewish) into arranging it, because the movie's anti-Iran (despite
>> a quick conciliatory sop at the beginning) stance is a great piece of
>> propaganda, a present-day Why We Fight, for our impending attack on Iran
>> (or at least, our impending support of Israel's attack on Iran).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  -----Original Message-----
>> From: kelber <kelber at mindspring.com>
>> To: pynchon-l <pynchon-l at waste.org>
>> Sent: Wed, Feb 27, 2013 4:27 pm
>> Subject: Re: 911 Prewarning
>>
>>   My husband had just parked a rental car on a rooftop garage several
>> blocks from the trade center, when the first tower was already in flames,
>> and he stood in a group of people who watched as an airplane seemed to fly
>> straight towards them, banked, then hit the second tower.  Much as I often
>> have squabbles with him, I pretty certain he's not now and never has been a
>> Bush or CIA or Israeli government operative.
>>
>>  There's absolutely no contradiction between some extremely brilliant,
>> brave, murderous, and sociopathic anti-American terrorists destroying the
>> towers, and Cheney, Wolfowitz and Co. taking full political advantage of it.
>>
>>  As long as we're talking conspiracy theories, how about these:
>>
>>  1.  Why has the anthrax attack that followed 9/11 remained unsolved,
>> virtually unexamined, and still rarely mentioned in the press?  My
>> conspiracy theory: investigation would reveal that the US had, and has
>> always had a bio-weapons program.  The press was strong-armed into silence
>> by the State Department/Pentagon, as a matter of national security.
>>
>>  2.  Why did a mediocre, forgettable movie like Argo sweep all the
>> awards ceremony, get a personal well-wish by new Secretary of State John
>> Kerry, and finally get personally awarded the Best Picture Oscar by
>> Michelle Obama?  My conspiracy theory: State Department/Pentagon
>> strong-armed all of the Hollywood power-brokers (not all of who, by the
>> way, are Jewish) into arranging it, because the movie's anti-Iran (despite
>> a quick conciliatory sop at the beginning) stance is a great piece of
>> propaganda, a present-day Why We Fight, for our impending attack on Iran
>> (or at least, our impending support of Israel's attack on Iran).
>>
>>  Laura
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Antonin Scriabin
>> Sent: Feb 27, 2013 3:33 PM
>> To: Ian Livingston
>> Cc: Lemuel Underwing , Keith Davis , kelber at mindspring.com, pynchon -l
>> Subject: Re: 911 Prewarning
>>
>>  "selling the Iraq war"
>>
>>  This is one thing that seems pretty firmly established.  The Iraq war,
>> from top to bottom, was / is a pretty scandalous disaster on the part of
>> the Bush administration.  There are "weird things" about 9/11, but nothing
>> we can no for sure.  I agree whole-heartedly with the sentiment concerning
>> trust of the media / government press releases.  Basically, we shouldn't
>> have any.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Ian Livingston <igrlivingston at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Well, whether or not there were any conspiracies involved in 9/11 or in
>>> selling the Iraq war, or in the Kennedy and King assassinations, I think we
>>> owe it to our rational selves to doubt anything news media or government
>>> news releases tell us. Listening to professional liars is like being
>>> professionally gullible or something. I, for one, have a lot more questions
>>> than I have understandings, and as far as certainties go, well, I'm not too
>>> sure.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Lemuel Underwing <
>>> luunderwing at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ignoring the issues of Controlled Demolition, remote-controlled flying
>>>> (think drone), or any of that other stuff...
>>>> I don't think it's nutty to claim that the Bush Administration had it
>>>> on Good Authority that there were planned attacks on the World Trade
>>>> Center, going so far as to Ignore explicit warnings by numerous
>>>> Intelligence Agencies overseas.
>>>> Hell, the Mossad (far from committing the attacks) actually warned the
>>>> American Government in July of them, an Israeli Real Estate company even
>>>> went so far as to break their lease in order to move out of the (south, i
>>>> believe) tower.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  President Bush's (it seems to actually have been under Cheney)
>>>> National Energy Policy Development Group had a series of top secret
>>>> meetings shortly after Bush was sworn in....
>>>>
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Task_Force
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Keith Davis <kbob42 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Klingons...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Antonin Scriabin <
>>>>> kierkegaurdian at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Some claim there were no airplanes (the footage is faked), some claim
>>>>>> the airplanes were a way to distract from the fact that it was a controlled
>>>>>> demolition, etc.  You look hard enough, you will find ever possible
>>>>>> conspiratorial angle ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:57 PM, <kelber at mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've never understood: do the conspiracy theorists (sorry, nuts)
>>>>>>> claim there were no airplanes?  Or that George Bush called the airlines and
>>>>>>> got them to crash the airplanes?  Or that he rounded up some
>>>>>>> Hollywood-issue terrorists to pose as real suicide bombers to crash the
>>>>>>> airplanes into buildings pre-mined with explosives?  All in the service of
>>>>>>> bringing down the value of some prime Manhattan real estate?  Wouldn't it
>>>>>>> have been easier to just wait for the inevitable flu pandemic or climate
>>>>>>> event and blame it on Iraq/Iran/whoever meddling?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Laura
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: David Morris **
>>>>>>> Sent: Feb 27, 2013 2:44 PM
>>>>>>> To: Richard Ryan **
>>>>>>> Cc: Lewis Zhang **, Michael Bailey **, Pynchon-L **
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: 911 Prewarning
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I remember a youtube video conspiracy screed theorizing that the
>>>>>>> towers' fall was a controlled demolition, not caused by the jet impacts.
>>>>>>>  Too clean, it argued.  But it didn't mention that controlled demo requires
>>>>>>> explosives placed at columns throughout the building, not just in hidden
>>>>>>> spaces, like closets.  They must have used invisible explosives.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Richard Ryan <
>>>>>>> richardonriver at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  One of the interesting unexplored reports surrounding 911 -
>>>>>>>> there, doesn't on closer examination, appear to be much here other than
>>>>>>>> unsubstantiated hearsay, but it's odd that it never seems to have been
>>>>>>>> thoroughly investigated.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Odigo
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've always been troubled by the discovery of Mohammed Atta's
>>>>>>>> unscathed passport the day of the attack by A pedestrian.  Probably just
>>>>>>>> one of those weird flukes but it's unsettling....
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    **********
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  --
>>>>> www.innergroovemusic.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20130227/b09dd58a/attachment.html>