Bleeding Edge ARC on Ebay

Mark Kohut markekohut at yahoo.com
Fri Jun 7 10:04:21 CDT 2013


I, for one, hope an unauthorized scan never gets made.....or sent around if someone does...
 

________________________________
 From: Andreis Passarinho <eastcocker at gmail.com>
To: Markekohut <markekohut at yahoo.com> 
Cc: Ben Canard <bencanard2000 at gmail.com>; pynchon -l <pynchon-l at waste.org> 
Sent: Friday, June 7, 2013 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: Bleeding Edge ARC on Ebay
  


if anyone buys this please scan it and email me I will be your slave for life. 



On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Markekohut <markekohut at yahoo.com> wrote:

M & D had some ARC/ galleys printed for select reviewers and a few to give away to key readers.  
>I do not know how long before pub date ( but some on this list should)
>
>
>AtD Galleys for reviewers and a very few others--I think Tim Ware got one as he had set up the wiki for this one---were only available like 47 days or so before pub....( I am just alluding to a number, but someone online or in a print publication did mention the number of days he had to read it......and you are right, time was short.  
>
>
>As we talk and reflect, I vote that someone inside Penguin ( or the printer they use) printed out 
>The pages in the BLEEDING EDGE file as they are now---see Bailey's word from a publisher 
>Implying the book has not yet been fully proof-read...and slapped a phone shot of,the cover for it...
>
>
>GR circulated to paperback houses to read ( read into) to bid on before publication as a manuscript....I know a guy who has one.....the title on it is MINDLESS PLEASURES and it has 
>The Joni Mitchell lines.....
>
>
>
>
>Sent from my iPad
>
>On Jun 5, 2013, at 10:57 PM, Ben Canard <bencanard2000 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>Thanks for the ARC info, Mark. Rumors about previous P ARCs that I've heard say things like reviewers only got them in the weeks before publication. V. is the only one that I heard about that came out so early, December of '62, three months before publication. Never heard about CL49 ARC, but apparently, an early copy in a ringed-binder. No Arc for GR, SL, and VL. I guess I never heard anything about the date of the M&D and ATD ARCs. In any case, your explanation makes sense. 
>>
>>
>>
>>On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Markekohut <markekohut at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>galleys are usually single plain colors, like yellow. some publishers have a simple 2-color pattern.
>>>
>>>ARCs usually have some kind of real cover design, often/usually an image of the hardcover cover, but not always. This looks like a b & w shot of the cover.
>>>
>>>Long lead time magazines and periodicals need 3-4 months to get books reviewed.
>>>
>>>last Thursday thru Saturday was the annual booksellers' convention in NY (for these United States). Many heavily-printed Fall books were given away as ARCS by the hundreds/thousands...
>>>BLEEDING EDGE was not one.
>>>
>>>I suspect that this ARC is either one made, let's say in a non-kosher way and smuggled to someone who begged for it.....
>>>
>>>Or one of a batch printed and sent/given to magazine and periodical editors for review.
>>>
>>>Inherent Vice was first published in hardcover in the United States
>>>
>>>
>>>Sent from my iPad
>>>
>>>
>>>On Jun 5, 2013, at 10:12 PM, John Bailey <sundayjb at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> You're probably right. Looks like a super cheap print job so more
>>>> likely a galley if it is real.
>>>>
>>>> On a separate note - I see Bleeding Edge is being released as a
>>>> hardcover, whereas to my knowledge IV was only ever paperback. Is that
>>>> right? If so, kind of admitting that IV was a bit more... disposable?
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Ben Canard <bencanard2000 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Paypal gives you some protection. How much, I don't know. I haven't used it.
>>>>> I wonder if it's a galley rather than an ARC. Why would an ARC be around so
>>>>> early?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:33 PM, John Bailey <sundayjb at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was thinking that someone got royally ripped off there... but that
>>>>>> does look a fair bit like the IV ARC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:35 AM, rich <richard.romeo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> that was quick
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Ben Canard <bencanard2000 at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.ebay.com/itm/221236614597?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1438.l2649
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20130607/3872f2b3/attachment.html>


More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list