IV Random thoughts

[rich]

I don't question what you relate, Joseph just that maybe Inherent Vice
isn't all that informative. All those big issues you mention are barely
touched on in IV to any degree of in-depthness. IV and to a certain extent
AtD didn't really teach me anything or pointed to things I as an informed
person should've been aware of. not to sounds like a jerk but I knew all
this stuff already. all Pynchon did was lay down the highways and proper
street signs.




On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Joseph Tracy <brook7 at sover.net> wrote:

> Many reviewers and some listers have majored on a Cheech and Chong,, ha ha
> dumb stoners playing detective, approach to IV.  Ok, maybe, but the way
> Sportello unpacks his multilayered investigation of  LA/West Coast/
> American entry to the  70's cosmos is pretty damn sophisticated and
> Sportello in some sense represents the intelligence of a generation that
> may have been smoking some serious shit but saw through the war propaganda,
> and was correctly skeptical about the Nixon/ Reagan  economics, and Father
> knows best kill the commies psychology and the whole package of tube-fare
> anaesthezia  that facilitated the rise of the criminal far right into the
> center of world power and ended whatever remained of a politically
>  anti-fascist progressivism in the US. ( I am using fascism here as
> Mussolini used it to describe an aggressive world seizing union of
> government and corporate power)
>
> I would argue that  the stoner jokes are  a smoke screen for a serious
> attempt to use what might be called the soft boiled or possibly sunny side
> up detective genre to look at some of the real criminality of the cultural
> period it explores. Sportello ends up pointing at some real issues that are
> with us still. The revival of a  McCarthyist police state, the hollowing
> and financialization of the economy, a war on drugs run by a government
> funding its secret police with heroin money, the power of ultra rich
> capitalists like H Hughes to assassinate and silence opposition, the war to
> control the internet, the violence against whistleblowers, the flow of
> wealth to the 1%, the inherent child abuse of much american culture, the
> omnipresence of porn and pop during a period of supposed cultural
> conservatism and return to family values. All this and underlying
> everything, debt, lies and violence.
>
> Most reviewers don't talk about these things, not because they are not in
> the novel, but because most reviewers never talk about anything politically
>  or socially substantive or potentially abrasive, preferring to stay safely
> in the domain of  apolitical humanist literary talk. This timidity infects
> writers too.  Shut up, shut up, don't talk about anything not safely
> trivial.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20130517/fa2d5b96/attachment.html>