Reddit to Group Read Gravity's Rainbow
Antonin Scriabin
kierkegaurdian at gmail.com
Thu May 23 09:56:26 CDT 2013
I think we might have success with a *Bleeding Edge *group read since it
will be current and new. That said, I think the entire P-list will morph
into a giant, 37-thread group read overnight anyways, which suffices!
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Lemuel Underwing <luunderwing at gmail.com>wrote:
> Let's just pretend like Reddit never happened. That's what I'm doing. It's
> been such a time-sink for me the past year these last three months being
> Reddit-Free have been Bliss. Like that one fellow said "Hell is other
> people".
>
> The List is enough for me, thanks.
>
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 4:03 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> P-list group reads have been very fruitful, however erratic and
>> stumbling. The few that dedicate themselves to participating make it
>> rewarding. They always have limped to finish, loosing most participants
>> along the way. But we've always taken them at a snails pace, GR takes
>> about a year @ P-list speed. So it's no wonder they finish weak.
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, May 22, 2013, Bekah wrote:
>>
>>> How sad for you to have missed some excellent group reads here and other
>>> places.
>>>
>>> Bekah
>>>
>>> On May 21, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Prashant Kumar <
>>> siva.prashant.kumar at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > I don't see the point of this. General tone seems to view G'sR as a
>>> badge, a pin, a commendation and a ticket to smugness for looking at words
>>> on a page...now in a group! Every group read I've been part of has either
>>> disintegrated or been rather more than a little pointless, usually
>>> eventually, sometimes at the outset. I'm betting the latter, here.
>>> >
>>> > P.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 22 May 2013 02:08, Keith Davis <kbob42 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Good one, Mark.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Markekohut <markekohut at yahoo.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > LIKE....
>>> > a progressive unknotting into and out of....
>>> >
>>> > Sent from my iPad
>>> >
>>> > On May 21, 2013, at 11:20 AM, "Monte Davis" <montedavis at verizon.net>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Do you mean "what could go wrong that the P-list hasn't exemplified
>>> for
>>> > > twenty years"..?
>>> > >
>>> > > Sure, that sounds demanding, but creativity knows no limits.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > -----Original Message-----
>>> > > From: owner-pynchon-l at waste.org [mailto:owner-pynchon-l at waste.org]
>>> On Behalf
>>> > > Of Joe Allonby
>>> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 10:44 AM
>>> > > To: Mark Woollams
>>> > > Cc: pynchon -l
>>> > > Subject: Re: Reddit to Group Read Gravity's Rainbow
>>> > >
>>> > > What could go wrong?
>>> > >
>>> > > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Mark Woollams <
>>> woollams812 at yahoo.com>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> http://www.reddit.com/r/bookclub/comments/1eqi9f/the_next_big_read_will_be_g
>>> > > ravitys_rainbow_by/
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > www.innergroovemusic.com
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20130523/e75f85f5/attachment.html>
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list