Pynchon knows this, I say. Sorta always known.
Monte Davis
montedavis at verizon.net
Thu May 30 17:41:48 CDT 2013
It's the new original sin, man.
From: owner-pynchon-l at waste.org [mailto:owner-pynchon-l at waste.org] On Behalf
Of malignd at aol.com
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 5:47 PM
To: pynchon-l at waste.org
Subject: Re: Pynchon knows this, I say. Sorta always known.
So Copernicus, Tycho Brahe, Kepler, Newton, et al are to be held responsible
for AIDS, ebola virus, Lyme disease, etc. I admit, I hadn't considered
that.
-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Tracy <brook7 at sover.net>
To: P-list List <pynchon-l at waste.org>
Sent: Wed, May 29, 2013 11:45 pm
Subject: Re: Pynchon knows this, I say. Sorta always known.
I think part of the point though is that there is growing evidence that
science
is up against the limits of empiricism and has moved it's brightest
physicists
toward spewing out untestable multidimensional string theory and spending
billions to collide beams in search of Higgs's God particle. Is this not
some
kind of pseudo scientific holy grail that is as much philosophy as physics?
Will
a unified interpretation follow? How real is the thing they may or may not
have
found and what exactly is the question being answered? Cuz it's getting
mighty
hot around here, lots of people with malaria, aids, Lymes, Ebola Lots of
children starving, species disappearing, fibers in the web of life
breaking,
lot's of carbon and methane in the wind, toxic shit floating down the
river,arsenic in the rice, radioactive towns, a great deal of it thanks to
the
scientific revolution.
On May 29, 2013, at 6:31 PM, MalignD at aol.com wrote:
> Must disagree. Shallow, strawman arguments that seem ignorant of the fact
that disagreement, challenge, sometimes piecemeal answers are part of
science
and a large part of what makes it powerful.
>
> The questions he mentions are tough, and certainly there are no easy
answers.
But to suggest we're going to philosophize our way to them is ... well:
good
luck.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Davis <kbob42 at gmail.com>
> To: Joseph Tracy <brook7 at sover.net>
> Cc: P-list List <pynchon-l at waste.org>
> Sent: Wed, May 29, 2013 3:24 pm
> Subject: Re: Pynchon knows this, I say. Sorta always known.
>
> Amen
>
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Joseph Tracy <brook7 at sover.net> wrote:
> This is an excellent, brief but substantial rebuttal to the tidy
mathematical
models of Hawking and his presumptions about the meaning and explanatory
power
of those models. Hawking sees himself as part of the clear-headed data-based
scientific revolution, when he is largely a conservative voice defending a
particular POV that has been around with variations since the Enlightenment.
I
often feel that science has been politicized into the same name-calling and
two
party divisions which dominate political thought. It's a matter of survival,
allies in a tough market place rather than truly independent thinking . All
of
this is discussed in Pynchon's essay( Is it O.K. to be a Luddite?) referring
to
CP Snow's lecture- "The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution" .
>
> Mostly it looks a lot like talking monkeys heaving shit at each other when
they/we reach the limits of their/our ability to explain, know or
understand.
To me part of the mindset I have imperfectly come to ( I still throw shit
from
time to time), is a willingness to live with many unanswered questions. I
feel
less hardened in this space, and I feel Pynchon and many artists occupy this
space and ask us to try it out. It allows for the deepest kind of curiosity
without promising answers. I think it allows for taking philosophic ,
spiritual,
or moral positions without being self -righteously blind to the
inconsistencies
or problems in our model.
>
>
> On May 27, 2013, at 5:31 AM, Markekohut wrote:
>
> >
> >>
> >>
www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/may/27/physics-philosophy-quantum-rela
tivity-einstein?CMP=twt_fd
> >>
> >> Download the official Twitter app here
> >>
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPad
>
>
>
>
> --
> www.innergroovemusic.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20130530/84b3bd7c/attachment.html>
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list