9-11 box cutters 11 september utility knives
Joseph Tracy
brook7 at sover.net
Mon Nov 25 09:20:03 CST 2013
He doesn't "debunk" Maxine or other witnesses to some very strange doings. They stop their inquiries for personal safety. That is obvious in the book.
On Nov 25, 2013, at 5:21 AM, Fiona Shnapple wrote:
> JT sez,
>> So even though Pynchon, in BE does suggest some sinister possibilities along the lines of insider foreknowledge, almost no one on the p->list wants to even think about, hear about, or talk about it in anything but a very reactionary and fundamentally ad hominem way.
>
> He doesn't suggests them; his characters do; he debunks them. Why?
> That is the question. The answer is not too easy to get at. You, and
> the others who attack you, ignore the book, for the most part. It's
> not easy to argue that P suggests something sinister, not with this
> book. Give me pages and I'll argue against such a reading.
> -
> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list
-
Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list