9-11 box cutters 11 september utility knives

[Fiona Shnapple]

And there safety is threatened by? Page and passage, please.

On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Joseph Tracy <brook7 at sover.net> wrote:
> He doesn't "debunk" Maxine or other witnesses to some very strange doings. They stop their inquiries for personal safety. That is obvious in the book.
> On Nov 25, 2013, at 5:21 AM, Fiona Shnapple wrote:
>
>> JT sez,
>>> So even though Pynchon, in BE does suggest some sinister possibilities along the lines of insider foreknowledge,  almost no one on the p->list wants to even think about, hear about, or talk about it in anything but a very reactionary  and fundamentally ad hominem way.
>>
>> He doesn't suggests them; his characters do; he debunks them.  Why?
>> That is the question. The answer is not too easy to get at. You, and
>> the others who attack you, ignore the book, for the most part. It's
>> not easy to argue that P suggests something sinister, not with this
>> book. Give me pages and I'll argue against such a reading.
>> -
>> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list
>
> -
> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?listpynchon-l
-
Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l